Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • David M. Lasley on Analysis of Simkin v. Blank

    • Patrick S. O'Donnell on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • A.J. Sutter on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Weslie on First Amendment “Exceptions” and What the First Amendment Means (#2)

    • Gerard Magliocca on Same-Sex Marriage Opinion

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Same-Sex Marriage Opinion

    • Gerard Magliocca on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Gerard Magliocca on Same-Sex Marriage Opinion

    • Joe on Same-Sex Marriage Opinion

    • Gfd on Same-Sex Marriage Opinion

    • Gerard Magliocca on Same-Sex Marriage Opinion

    • Gerard Magliocca on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Mike on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Norse Wisdom on Digital Music

posted by Frank Pasquale

communism.jpgEven if antitrust in the U.S. slowly fades into a subfield of legal history, international pressure can lead to fairer business practices. Consider Norway’s recent pressure on Apple to open up its iTunes/iPod music platform to rival players: “Norway’s consumer regulator declared the lack of interoperability illegal, and gave Apple until Oct. 1 to change it or face legal action and possible fines.”

When emissions standards were introduced in the 1970′s, it’s said that Toyota hired a thousand engineers, and Ford hired a thousand lawyers. We can see where each company is now. Apple’s response to the Norwegian directive appears to show that, after Fordishly fighting France tooth and nail on interoperability, they are finally interested in a constructive approach. Consider these extraordinary words on Apple’s website:

[A final] alternative is to abolish DRMs entirely. Imagine a world where every online store sells DRM-free music encoded in open licensable formats. In such a world, any player can play music purchased from any store, and any store can sell music which is playable on all players. This is clearly the best alternative for consumers, and Apple would embrace it in a heartbeat. If the big four music companies would license Apple their music without the requirement that it be protected with a DRM, we would switch to selling only DRM-free music on our iTunes store. Every iPod ever made will play this DRM-free music.

Why would the big four music companies agree to let Apple and others distribute their music without using DRM systems to protect it? The simplest answer is because DRMs haven’t worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy. Though the big four music companies require that all their music sold online be protected with DRMs, these same music companies continue to sell billions of CDs a year which contain completely unprotected music. That’s right! No DRM system was ever developed for the CD, so all the music distributed on CDs can be easily uploaded to the Internet, then (illegally) downloaded and played on any computer or player.

Precisely. Rather than trying to sweep the sand from the shore, and massively annoying everyone in the process, why not follow this plan? True interoperability would likely lead to a boom in the sale of both digital music players and music. For way too long, the industry has focused on minimizing losses, rather than maximizing gains.

Fortunately, the scorched earth litigation strategy against infringers is getting less viable as a few defendants fight back. In Capitol Record v. Debbie Foster, the defendant successfully introduced a “‘prove it was me using the computer’ defense.” The strategy may gain traction: “Although the judge in Elektra v. Santangelo declined to dismiss the labels’ infringement claims against Patti Santangelo, he doubted that ‘an Internet-illiterate parent who does not know Kazaa from a kazoo’ could be found liable for file sharing done in her house without her knowledge or consent.” Foster actually won attorney’s fees against the RIAA–throwing a wrench into the works of an infringement litigation machine.


 February 8, 2007 at 9:35 am   Posted in: Intellectual Property   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (7)

  1. Matt - February 8, 2007 at 10:09 am

    I must say that I’m at least a little bit skeptical of Apple’s claim here, in part because, even with music from companies that do not require DMRs and don’t especially care for them, Apple still makes the music such that it can only be played on an ipod. It seems pretty likely to me that really Apple is at least as much in favor of restricting the format as are the music companies, and that if they really cared they could use their weight to push change much more than they have.

  2. William - February 8, 2007 at 11:17 am

    We have been involved with digital music distribution for three years; and most of the indepedent lables that we speak with in Europe just want to sell music and promote their artist. Many of them allow free downloads of mp3 files and most would would not mind selling their files in this format.

    We have launched a socially responsible music

    social network at http://www.adelph.us

    Labels can create “Label” profiles that allow adelph.us members to find their artist and thier music.

    Lables that have uploaded their tracks and created stores on darmik.com can easily add their stores to their http://www.adelph.us label profile page. This will allow members of the ww.adelph.us to purchase tracks from your profile page.

    The store that you create on http://www.darmik.com can also be used on myspace and can also be easily integrated into any website.

    Darmik also gives labels the ability to sell cd’s in their stores as well as

    tracks.

    With your permission fans can sell and redistribute your music form their

    adelph.us profile pages as well as their blogs.

    You keep 90% of the revenue from the sell of any tracks or products

    Artist and Labels that are part of the http://www.adelph.us network and http://www.Darmik.com can donate a portion of their sales revenue

    to Darmik.com registerd non profits.

    The adelph.us service also includes an online green computing open office

    productivity suite (Lightapp) that is fully compatible with currently

    desktop

    applications.

    adelph.us and Darmik.com always donate a portion of their revenue to charity.

  3. Maryland Conservatarian - February 8, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    “…international pressure can lead to fairer business practices.”

    Don’t exactly see what a government telling a private company how it has to conduct business has to do with “fairer” practices – I know which side I trust to better treat this consumer….but is there anything most of the left doesn’t believe it can do better than those who are actually doing it?

  4. Bruce Boyden - February 8, 2007 at 7:21 pm

    It’s hard to know if Jobs’s proposal is serious or not. But it’s easy for him to make such offers with someone else’s music. My own proposal: Apple should leave its iPods lying around unprotected and unmonitored in the street in front of my house. That’s the best solution for consumers; well, at least one consumer, anyway.

  5. tim mcgraw - March 9, 2009 at 10:27 am

    i like the mp3 communism

  6. comi - July 7, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    fuck who ever put that picture!!!! if your downloading music illegally the your a capitalist.

  7. MF - May 10, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    Stupid picture. In simple words, the main concepts of communism are to work as hard as you can, put all your efforts for the welfare, and to take only what you really need. The idea of capitalism is to exploit somebody’s labor, making profit from spitting in the ceiling, selling things that cost 1$ for 1000$ putting people in constraints when they have no options (like medicine, for example)…
    So, I would say – “capitalism” fits better this poster :)

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress