<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voting Rules for Best Picture nominations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/01/voting_rules_fo_1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/01/voting_rules_fo_1.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/01/voting_rules_fo_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-55548</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/01/voting-rules-for-best-picture-nominations.html#comment-55548</guid>
		<description>Michael, I&#039;m happy to see that you&#039;re using your  legal &amp; intellectual firepower to address the inner workings of Academy Awards voting system. If only more law profs did this, we might eventually be quoted in the most important of publications--U.S. Weekly!  Or even, dare I dream, People?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I&#8217;m happy to see that you&#8217;re using your  legal &#038; intellectual firepower to address the inner workings of Academy Awards voting system. If only more law profs did this, we might eventually be quoted in the most important of publications&#8211;U.S. Weekly!  Or even, dare I dream, People?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryland Conservatarian</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/01/voting_rules_fo_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-55547</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryland Conservatarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/01/voting-rules-for-best-picture-nominations.html#comment-55547</guid>
		<description>&quot;But it&#039;s a bit depressing that our voting regimes for public officials aren&#039;t much better.&quot;

Hey, I&#039;m not happy with the new Pelosi-Reid tandem either but I think it&#039;s unseemly for people like us to blame &quot;our voting regimes&quot;.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But it&#8217;s a bit depressing that our voting regimes for public officials aren&#8217;t much better.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, I&#8217;m not happy with the new Pelosi-Reid tandem either but I think it&#8217;s unseemly for people like us to blame &#8220;our voting regimes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/01/voting_rules_fo_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-55546</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/01/voting-rules-for-best-picture-nominations.html#comment-55546</guid>
		<description>It is a preferential voting system:

http://www.moviecitynews.com/columnists/poland/2004_oscar/041209.html

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a preferential voting system:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moviecitynews.com/columnists/poland/2004_oscar/041209.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.moviecitynews.com/columnists/poland/2004_oscar/041209.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/01/voting_rules_fo_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-55545</link>
		<dc:creator>John Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/01/voting-rules-for-best-picture-nominations.html#comment-55545</guid>
		<description>Actually, this reminds me of the recent voting for the baseball hall of fame.  I did a lot of growing up just outside Baltimore, so the only shocker in the voting was that five ballots did &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; include his name.  One voter&#039;s public explanation was exactly what you&#039;re talking about.  &quot;Of &lt;em&gt;course&lt;/em&gt; Cal would get in, so &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt; don&#039;t have to vote for him.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, this reminds me of the recent voting for the baseball hall of fame.  I did a lot of growing up just outside Baltimore, so the only shocker in the voting was that five ballots did <em>not</em> include his name.  One voter&#8217;s public explanation was exactly what you&#8217;re talking about.  &#8220;Of <em>course</em> Cal would get in, so <em>I</em> don&#8217;t have to vote for him.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bodie</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/01/voting_rules_fo_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-55544</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/01/voting-rules-for-best-picture-nominations.html#comment-55544</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d need more data before calling this an allocation-of-preferences failure; perhaps it&#039;s instead a prediction-market failure.  Most critics have been lukewarm on the movie, other than Jennifer Hudson&#039;s and Eddie Murphy&#039;s performances.  Perhaps the voters liked aspects of the movie but really didn&#039;t think it deserved a best pic nomination.  I&#039;ve seen the &quot;waste-my-vote&quot; argument in the past, but I&#039;ve never seen it knock out an actual favorite.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d need more data before calling this an allocation-of-preferences failure; perhaps it&#8217;s instead a prediction-market failure.  Most critics have been lukewarm on the movie, other than Jennifer Hudson&#8217;s and Eddie Murphy&#8217;s performances.  Perhaps the voters liked aspects of the movie but really didn&#8217;t think it deserved a best pic nomination.  I&#8217;ve seen the &#8220;waste-my-vote&#8221; argument in the past, but I&#8217;ve never seen it knock out an actual favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
