Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Joe on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Phil on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Lee on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Car accident claim lawyers on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Andrew MacKie-Mason on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • G. Calamita on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Gerard Magliocca on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Mike on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Teaching Loads

posted by Jennifer Collins

I am on my law school’s long-term strategic planning committee, which should be working pretty intensely in the spring thinking about lots of different aspects of our law school. One issue that I have been thinking about lately is teaching loads. It seems to me that many schools are moving toward a 3 course teaching load, and I would be grateful if our law professor readers could help me collect some data. What is the teaching load at your school? If you have recently gone from four courses to three, has that made a meaningful difference in your academic life or in the number of course offerings at your school? (I also want to apologize in advance to any readers who may teach undergraduate students, who are no doubt appalled at the notion that law professors only have to teach three or four courses a year!)


 December 11, 2006 at 8:53 am   Posted in: Law School (Teaching)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (21)

  1. tim zinnecker - December 11, 2006 at 11:27 am

    The typical load at South Texas College of Law is six credits (two courses) per semester, with eligibility for a sabbatical every tenth academic semester.

  2. Ethan Leib - December 11, 2006 at 2:45 pm

    Hastings has a 2-2, which amounts to 10-12 credit hours. Brooklyn, where I was just visiting, is closer to a 2-1 as a standard. But Hastings has a pre-tenure leave, which Brooklyn does not — and Hastings has a very generous maternity/paternity leave policy. Although a few fully paid leaves seem like small matters compared to much more long-term matters like standard loads, when one is pre-tenure, leaves can be extraordinarily important.

  3. Dave Hoffman - December 11, 2006 at 3:10 pm

    At Temple, new hires are 1:1 for the first year, and then 1:2. Pre-tenure leave as well. I don’t think it has mattered much to our course offerings (although I’m not the best placed to know) as we’ve also expanded the faculty.

    I’ve only lived under the new regime, but I’ve heard that for those that made the switch, it made a noticeable difference in making academic-year scholarship possible.

  4. Anon - December 11, 2006 at 3:43 pm

    I’m on the market this year, and teaching load is certainly something that every school is either touting or hiding.

  5. JrL - December 11, 2006 at 3:46 pm

    Sorry – I’m not a regular law prof. What do 2-2, 2-1, 1:1:, and 1:2 mean? The “six credits … per semester” I understand — as I understand my own 2-credit adjunct load.

    Maybe someone can ask what school pay their adjuncts. Little enough to make the very, very cost-effective, I suspect, even for law school with higher teaching loads.

  6. Heidi Kitrosser - December 11, 2006 at 4:03 pm

    Minnesota is 10 credits per year. There’s also pre-tenure leave and a credit-banking system. (The latter means that you can teach more than the required units in a given year and then “cash in” the extras to reduce your load at some later point). Being at the tail-end of my one semester pre-tenure leave, I agree that having one makes a huge difference. And while I haven’t yet taken advantage of the banking system, I suspect that that makes a big difference as well.

  7. on the market - December 11, 2006 at 5:28 pm

    Any thoughts on how big a deal courseload issues should be for those currently on the market? I have offers from both 2:2 and 1:2 schools, and I am not quite sure how much weight to give this issue.

  8. Keith Rowley - December 11, 2006 at 8:02 pm

    In response to “on the market,” the answer is (drumroll please) “It depends.” Will you be a noticeably more productive scholar, a noticeably better teacher, a noticeably healthier and happier person, if you teach 3 hours in the fall and 5-6 in the spring versus 5-6 hours in the fall and 5-6 hours in the spring? Only you can answer that (and, untill you do both, your answer will be a guess). Will you be teaching more students if you teach fewer classes? Will you get to teach multiple sections of the same course (assuming that you want to do so), thus reducing your prep time? Does the school support teaching assistants who can help carry some of the course prep, student conference, and non-exam grading load? Is one of your courses a low-enrollment seminar that could be a boon to your scholarly agenda? What drives the school’s workload policy: Is it a statement about the value of faculty time and talent or is it a matter of economic or political necessity?

    JrL’s point about “1:2″ vs. “2:2″ is well taken. UNLV is moving toward a “1:2″ load for faculty that are also productive scholars. However, that “1:2″ load can result in as few as 9 semester hours or as many as 11 or 12. Are three 3-credit courses over an academic year the same as a 3-credit course, a 4-credit course, and a 5-credit course over the the same year? Absolutely not. Will a school that has a 1:2 course and a 9-11 hour policy consider someone teaching a one semester 4-credit elective and a one semester 5-credit 1L course to have a full load, or will she have to tack on another 2-3 credit course to meet the “1:2″ part of the courseload policy (while maxing out or exceeding the “9-11 credit hour” part)?

    Right now, UNLV is focusing more on the 9 to 11 hours than the number of courses. We’re also giving some credit to faculty who supervise a journal, moot court, or an unusual number of directed reading or directed research students. Pre-tenure faculty are entitled to a one-semester “research assignment” (for political reasons, we can’t call it a “leave”). All tenured and tenure-track faculty are eligible for a “research assignment” after teaching three full academic years following the year in which they last had a research assignment. This is my 6th year teaching at UNLV (9th overall) and I am wrapping up my second semester-long research assignment. We also have credit banking, which allowed me to take a light load the fall semester after my father died in late July and make it up by teaching a course the following summer.

  9. John Oberdiek - December 11, 2006 at 8:03 pm

    Rutgers-Camden requires 10 credits per year, or what amounts to a 2:1 load. They also grant semester leaves after every six semesters, which applies to junior faculty as well, so that one gets the fall of one’s fourth year off. In addition, Rutgers has what’s called a “competitive leave” policy, permitting one to take off a year at full pay on top one’s normal leave schedule if one gets a nationally-regarded fellowship that pays at least a nominal amount.

  10. John Oberdiek - December 11, 2006 at 8:06 pm

    Rutgers-Camden requires 10 credits per year, or what amounts to a 2:1 load. For the first two years, however, one teaches a 1:1 load. They also grant semester leaves after every six semesters, which applies to junior faculty as well, so that one gets the fall of one’s fourth year off. In addition, Rutgers has what’s called a “competitive leave” policy, permitting one to take off a year at full pay on top one’s normal leave schedule if one gets a nationally-regarded fellowship that pays at least a nominal amount.

  11. Keith Rowley - December 11, 2006 at 8:11 pm

    P.S.: Jennifer, don’t feel the need to be too apologetic to our colleagues in the arts and sciences. I serve on our university-wide sabbatical committee and our law faculty have onerous teaching loads compared to many of the non-law folks whose dossiers I review each year. Also, having taught three years’ worth of 12 credits per semester of undergraduate economics courses before I went to law school, I can assure you that my 9-12 credits per year of law school courses is much more taxing than was my 24 credits per year of undergraduate economics.

  12. Howard Wasserman - December 11, 2006 at 10:47 pm

    FIU is 1:2 (9-10 credits) first year, then 2:2 (roughly 10-13 hours) after that. There is talk of instituting a reduced load the year prior to tenure.

  13. Ethan Leib - December 12, 2006 at 12:14 am

    PS Both Hastings and Brooklyn have reduced loads in the first year; most schools give new teachers a course off to get acclimated.

  14. John Armstrong - December 12, 2006 at 1:45 am

    Keith, UNLV must be remarkably lax on its faculty. I’m on the market now and it’s 3-and-3′s and worse as far as the eye can see in mathematics.

    As for your 24-credit year, what courses were they? What levels? Multiple sections of the same course (as noted above, reducing prep time)? Any graduate teaching in there as well (often requiring making up the course as you go along with no book to fall back on)? How do the average salaries compare?

    Prof. Collins: I appreciated your nod to the salt mines of undergraduate education, especially the earlier years of a career. I’m not saying that law school teaching is a cakewalk, but three-course years which pay enough to live on just don’t exist on our side of the table other than some named postdoctoral positions.

  15. Lawrence Cunningham - December 12, 2006 at 8:23 am

    A good resource to obtain these data are the Annual Reports of the ABA, which state the average number of credit hours taught by full-time faculty of every ABA-approved law school. Every ABA-approved Law School Dean receives these.

    For 2005-06, the ABA Reports showed that 10.2 credit hours is the average credit load for approved Law Schools with student bodies in the range of 700 to 1000.

    At Boston College Law School, we are moving from 4 enterprises per year to 3 enterprises per year. From last year to this year, this move reduced our average credit load from 11.2 to 10.2 credits.

    We did this without impairing the curriculum by offering smaller-enrollment courses in alternate years (I call these Odd/Even Fall Courses and Odd/Even Spring Courses) plus we are doing some additional hiring this year and in coming years. Ideally, our average annual load should approach 9 credits.

  16. Scott Moss - December 12, 2006 at 10:23 am

    Marquette is (1) 1:2 for your first two years, then (2) 2:2 thereafter. One other variable is class size: virtually all our classes are 20-50 students, with 1L classes being either 40, 64, or 80 — and nothing above 80. One class with 120 students can mean several weeks of finals grading….

  17. Calvin Massey - December 12, 2006 at 12:01 pm

    Hastings is less monolithic than Ethan’s postings suggest. The nominal requirement is 12 semester credits annually, but that means, in practice, that people teaching two four unit courses and a three unit course end up with three courses annually (or 11 units). Also, for some time Hastings’s unstated practice has been to permit productive scholars to teach three courses annually, even if that means 10 units total. Unfortunately, that policy seems to be no longer observed. Because I like teaching I don’t mind 2:2, but I do think it is an impediment to scholarly productivity.

  18. Ethan Leib - December 12, 2006 at 3:11 pm

    Thanks for the info, Calvin. But, as I said, 10 to 12 units seems to be standard. Although that usually works out to a 2-2, obviously there are ways to get to a 2-1 and have 10-12 units of credit still. As we expand the faculty dramatically, I’d expect Hastings to embrace the more common load of “top” schools.

  19. Jeremy Telman - December 13, 2006 at 6:00 pm

    The load at Valparaiso is 10 credits a year, and the basic idea is that we teach 1:2 or 2:1. I teach two four-credit courses, so my load comes out to 11 a year. Some of my colleagues routinely teach “overloads” that get them up around 14 credits a year, with course loads that look more like 3:2.

  20. Melanie Milow - September 10, 2007 at 5:21 pm

    Okay, so I’m nowhere near being a law professor, however I just became a dance professor at an institution that has no standards for class prep time per teaching credit, and I’m attempting to find out if there is any formula or standard that I can borrow. I’m not even sure if that is what this post is about, just taking a chance that someone may have some information for me in that respect.

    Anyone?

  21. Michael W. Mullane - March 30, 2010 at 9:48 am

    Is there some rule that limits law professors to teaching no more than 4 courses or 12 credits a year?

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress