Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Rachel Karash on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • MBL on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • MBL on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • feathered_head on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Concernicus on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Ian on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Peterk on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Robert on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Three Oranges on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Paul Robichaux on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • JR on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Jan on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Mark on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Women’s Funds

posted by Jennifer Collins

I’ve recently been asked to get involved with a new women’s fund that is being created here in Winston-Salem (which I feel compelled to mention is the home of the extremely impressive Wake Forest football team! Go Deacs!) The idea is that women are both underrepresented as charitable donors (because even in two-income families men tend to control a household’s charitable giving) and that charities specifically targeted toward helping women and girls are underfunded (according to the statistics the fund gave me, less than five percent of philanthropic dollars in the U.S. go specifically to programs for women and girls). The idea is that you buy into the fund, pledging to make an annual donation every year for three years, and then you get a vote as to how the fund’s resources are allocated. Do any of our readers have experience with these kinds of funds? Any reactions about whether they are a good idea?


 November 13, 2006 at 4:22 pm   Posted in: Feminism and Gender   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (5)

  1. Sarah S. - November 13, 2006 at 5:03 pm

    Professor -

    Check out Women’s Way at http://www.womensway.org

    I think the allocation process is different in that full time staff or board members get to choose where the funds go (recipients are either member agencies or apply for grants from the general fund), but similar in its umbrella-like/clearinghouse features.

    “Founded in Philadelphia in 1977, WOMENS WAY is the country’s oldest and largest women’s funding federation. Our mission is to raise money and public awareness to fight for and achieve women’s equality, safety, self-sufficiency and reproductive freedom through women-centered funding, advocacy and education.”

  2. law student - November 13, 2006 at 7:43 pm

    I have no experience with these types of funds, but I did want to put in my two cents.

    I am a firm believer that programs targeted towards young women and girls – particularly programs that introduce girls to some of the more male-dominated areas (eg. engineering, the hard sciences, and yes, even law) are incredibly valuable. Of course, I may be biased because I graduated from a women’s college… however, I will always be grateful for the support and encouragement I received from role models who were women. And I think any steps that would serve to extend this type of support towards other women (whether it be through mentoring or donating to to these types of funds) is an excellent idea.

  3. AYY - November 14, 2006 at 1:22 am

    Wouldn’t you want to know what percentage of the proceeds actually goes to charity? Also, you make a donation and all you get is one vote (out of how many) as to how the funds are going to be allocated? What if they decide to allocate the funds to groups you’d prefer not to support.

    You can donate to any charity you want without going through the rigamarole. So I don’t understand what’s the advantage of the fund

  4. Christine Hurt - November 14, 2006 at 9:40 am

    Jennifer, there was an article yesterday in the NYT on “giving circles” and larger philanthropic funds: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/13/us/13circles.html?_r=1&oref=slogin. AYY: The idea behind these funds or giving circles is that you leverage your philanthropy. If 20 friends were to donate $100 to a women’s shelter in dribs and drabs, the money would go to the general fund. However, $2000 (or $20,000) could be earmarked for something more substantial, and the fund could be more influential in choosing what that would be. In addition, the transaction costs for donating to individual causes may be higher than the administrative costs of donating to a fund. How do you research what charities are best or most efficient? Just like investing in individual stocks v. a mutual fund/index fund, a philanthropic fund centralizes these research costs.

  5. Donna Douglass - May 30, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    I am involved in starting a women’s fund right now. One answer to AYY’s question, “Why go through the rigamarol?” is that the “rigamarole” is the democratic process. There are still numerous instances of women not having full democratic experiences in their daily lives–even women “of means.” In fact, sometimes, especially, women of means. They are often married to men who make all the philanthropic decisions in the family–not to mention the importance of women’s funds in emerging economies around the world. Our plan is to raise $50,000 in pooled funds each year to be awarded to only one or two nonprofit projects that will have significant impact in our community. At the same time we are accepting contributions to a Women’s Fund Endowment so that this experience will be available to our daughters and granddaughters.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress