Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 


advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


University governance as a new topic of public discussion.

An unusual profile of Mary Anne Franks (kw)

Aggressive copyright litigation run amok. (fp)

USA Today's Matt Krantz quoting me on Warren Buffett joining Twitter.  (LAC)

Private prisons? Why, sure! What could possibly go wrong? (kw)

TNR profiles Susan Crawford (kw)

Berkshire Hathaway is bigger than Warren Buffett.  Manual of Ideas (LAC).

Guns don't shoot people, kitchen appliances shoot people (kw)

Via Glom, Sat Eve Post review of The Essays of Warren Buffett.

Jack Coffee on Bad Plaintiffs' Counsel in M&A Deals and What Must Be Done to Break Them


Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Shag from Brookline on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Brett Bellmore on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Brett Bellmore on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Peter Strauss on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • John Duffy on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Andrew on BRIGHT IDEAS: Q&A with Bruce Schneier about Liars and Outliers

    • Joe on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • John Duffy on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Marty Lederman on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Brett Bellmore on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Ryan Calo on Franks on "How to Feel Like a Woman, or Why Punishment Is a Drag"

    • Anon on Wachtell Lipton's Errors on Shareholder-Paid Director Bonuses

    • Sean Croston on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Shag from Brookline on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • jdgalt on Wrongful Birth and Adoption
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Short Course on Some Origins of Inequality

posted by Frank Pasquale

no child left behind.jpg

Recently my law school’s clinic “filed a class action lawsuit in federal court on behalf of all parents of children attending Newark Public Schools who are being denied their rights under the No Child Left Behind Act.” BlackProf regular Shavar Jeffries is lead counsel for the plaintiffs, who charge that the “Newark Public Schools district has systematically failed to meet even the Act’s minimum notification requirements.”

In honor of that effort, I’m highlighting a fascinating article from the NYT Magazine by Paul Tough on the challenges facing the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) effort. The article notes that NCLB aims to erase a persistent achievement gap between African American and white, and lower and middle/upper class, students (by 2014). It summarizes two bodies of literature on the subject:

The first is about causes; the second is about cures. The first has been taking place in academia, among economists and anthropologists and sociologists who are trying to figure out exactly where the gap comes from, why it exists and why it persists. The second is happening among and around a loose coalition of schools, all of them quite new, all established with the goal of wiping out the achievement gap altogether.

The “causes” literature is fascinating. I’ve heard about studies like Lareau’s Unequal Childhoods for some time, but the quantifications provided in the article are compelling:

By age 3, the average child of a professional heard about 500,000 encouragements and 80,000 discouragements. For the welfare children, the situation was reversed: they heard, on average, about 75,000 encouragements and 200,000 discouragements. Hart and Risley found that as the number of words a child heard increased, the complexity of that language increased as well. As conversation moved beyond simple instructions, it blossomed into discussions of the past and future, of feelings, of abstractions, of the way one thing causes another — all of which stimulated intellectual development.

I’ve heard similar explanations of a new gender gap in academics; social critics claim that boys too often succumb to a “dude culture that demeans academic achievement” and discourages expression of ideas.

So what are the solutions? They involve massive effort, and will test whether NCLB is mere opportunistic “symbolic politics” or a real effort to address inequality.


Tough (the NYT reporter) draws three lessons from successful charter schools:

The schools that are achieving the most impressive results with poor and minority students tend to follow three practices. First, they require many more hours of class time than a typical public school. . . . .Second, they treat classroom instruction and lesson planning as much as a science as an art. Explicit goals are set for each year, month and day of each class, and principals have considerable authority to redirect and even remove teachers who aren’t meeting those goals. . . . . Third, they make a conscious effort to guide the behavior, and even the values, of their students by teaching what they call character. Using slogans, motivational posters, incentives, encouragements and punishments, the schools direct students in everything from the principles of teamwork and the importance of an optimistic outlook to the nuts and bolts of how to sit in class, where to direct their eyes when a teacher is talking and even how to nod appropriately.

These all sound like reasonable steps to me, but very difficult to implement. A key question then arises: is the charter school form the only one that can implement them? Or can they be integrated into a public school framework? Jeffries raises doubts about the latter possibility. My own sense is that, whatever the institutional home of successful interventions, I hope that society more properly rewards and recognizes the committed teachers who are making a difference here. One of my cousins taught in a religiously-affiliated school in Watts, where part of her sacrifice entailed not having health insurance–and after a car accident she was stuck in an overcrowded ER in County Hospital for 14 hours before receiving care. Perhaps the Bush Administration should signal a commitment to charter schools by guaranteeing health care for all teachers in them.

Photo Credit: KFUPE. I believe they are standing in front of a Potemkin schoolhouse in front of the Department of Education.


 November 30, 2006 at 3:13 pm   Posted in: Civil Rights, Education   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (8)

  1. Rachel Godsil - November 30, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    Fabulous post, Frank. Thanks for drawing attention to this critically important issue.

  2. Maryland Conservatarian - November 30, 2006 at 10:31 pm

    “Perhaps the Bush Administration should signal a commitment to charter schools by guaranteeing health care for all teachers in them.”

    yeah, that’s gonna fly with the teacher’s unions

  3. Maryland Conservatarian - November 30, 2006 at 10:32 pm

    “Perhaps the Bush Administration should signal a commitment to charter schools by guaranteeing health care for all teachers in them.”

    yeah, that’s gonna fly with the teachers’ unions

  4. Haninah - December 1, 2006 at 9:24 am

    A great post, as always. Regarding the NYTimes article about the Hart and Risley study, though, it’s probably worth pointing out that that study was conducted with a sample size of only 6 families, and is apparently considered in the business to be a good preliminary study rather than a conclusive one. See a recent post at another very respected academic blog – UPenn’s Language Log: http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003831.html, scroll down about halfway down.

    By the way, for those interested in the gender-in-education issue, Language Log has also had a very interesting long-running series about popular myths concerning the science of gender differences in language and education.

    Haninah

  5. Rachel Godsil - December 1, 2006 at 1:30 pm

    Just a clarification, charter schools are in fact public schools. They take different forms in different jurisdictions, but they differ from traditional public schools by being exempt from many of the regulations/obligations placed upon traditional public schools. Often people are confused about the difference between charter schools and “voucher” schools — the latter are purely private, sometimes religiously affiliated, schools that parents can use government “vouchers” to pay for.

  6. Maryland Conservatarian - December 1, 2006 at 4:21 pm

    Ms. Godsil is correct and one of the ways charters can differ is in not using union teachers. Hence my belief that anything that can possibly make teaching in a charter school more attractive will simply not fly with those unions…meaning it’ll never fly with Congressional Dems.

  7. Joseph Slater - December 8, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    Prof. Godsil did not mention “teachers unions” and in fact, despite right-wing rhetoric to the contrary, unionization of teachers is, if anything, good for student performance.

    Indiana University’s Robert M. Carini analyzed 17 “prominent studies” that examined the link between teacher unions and student achievement. His conclusion? “Unionism raises achievement modestly for most students in public schools.”

    Specifically, Carini reported that students with unionized teachers scored higher on standardized tests and were more likely to graduate from high school. See Steelman Powell and Carini, “Do Teacher Unions Hinder Educational Performance? Lessons Learned from State SAT and ACT Scores. Harvard Education Review, Winter 2000.

  8. Maryland Conservatarian - December 9, 2006 at 12:51 pm

    …with all due respect to the Indy professor, it is nonsensical to imagine students responding better to a teacher simply because said teacher pays dues to an organization whose main purpose seems to be electing a Democratic hegemony. It strains the imagination to picture my local Baltimore City schools as being even worse off, save for the inspirational presence of union teachers.

    Yes, I know Ms. Godsil didn’t mention “teacher’s unions”…neither did Mr. Pasquale…my point is simply that improvements to charter schools such as “guaranteeing health care for all teachers in them” will never get out of a Democratic Congress because the teachers’ unions simply will not allow it…unless we’re in a brave new world where Dems don’t march to the unions beat or the unions aren’t in it first and formost for themselves.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Kelli A. Alces
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ryan Calo
Claire Hill
Jay Kesten
William McGeveran
Meredith Render
Aaron Saiger
David L. Schwartz
Olivier Sylvain
Charles K. Whitehead
Aaron Zelinsky


















Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Derek Bambauer
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Khiara Bridges
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Gabriella Coleman
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
andré douglas pond cummings
Allison Danner
Laura DeNardis
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Susan Freiwald
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Vivian E. Hamilton
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Angela Harris
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Tayyab Mahmud
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Janai Nelson
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
David Opderback
David Orentlicher
Michael O'Shea
Kristen Osenga
Mary-Rose Papandrea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
William Reynolds
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Brishen Rogers
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schleicher
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Lea Shaver
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Peter Swire
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Joseph Turow
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
Privacy and Security Training
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress