Nazi Stolen Art Claims Pervade Record Auction
posted by Christine Farley
Welcome to the season of the major art auctions in New York. The New York Times (11/9/06) reported:
In a landmark sale, the biggest in auction history, nearly half a billion dollars’ worth of art changed hands last night at Christie’s sale of Impressionist and modern art. Soaring prices for blockbuster paintings by Klimt and Gauguin left thousands of spectators, who came to watch and to buy, gasping.
Not me. Instead I’m gasping at all the legal back stories involved in Wednesday night’s auction.
The most current one involved Christie’s lead item: Picasso’s “Portrait de Angel Fernandez de Soto” a.k.a. “The Absinthe Drinker.” On Monday, SDNY judge Jed Rakoff dismissed a suit brought against the auction house by an heir of a prominent Jewish Berlin banker who had owned the painting during WWII. The suit claimed title to the painting and sought its return or $60 million plus attorneys fees. Although Judge Rakoff ruled that the federal court had no jurisdiction over the matter, he hinted at his opinion on the merits stating, “I know that no one in the art world is just interested in money or in buying and selling paintings for profit. They’re guided by their belief in truth and beauty. But nevertheless, one might suspect that this is just a fight about money.” That suspicion was first raised by Christie’s who publicly questioned the motivation of the plaintiff in waiting 70 years to bring suit and then only days before this major auction. Christie’s attempted to take the high ground calling the plaintiff’s actions “a disservice to the restitution community.”
The painting has been owned by the foundation of Sir Andrew Lloyd Weber’s (of “Cats” fame) since 1995. According to the plaintiff, his ancestor consigned the painting to his Swiss art dealer who sold it in the last months of his life. Christie’s contends the painting was sold after his death, but argues that either way it was a legal sale. The plaintiff’s suit rests on his claim the sale of the painting was under duress by the Nazis; a so-called “forced sale.” In this case, it seems that the Nazis seized the banker’s assets thereby forcing him to sell the art in 1934 in a depressed Berlin art market. This set of facts departs slightly from successful forced-sale claims in which art was sold in “Jew auctions” where Jewish art dealers were prohibited from making sales other than through Nazi-organized art auctions.
The lawsuit was re-filed in New York State Supreme Court on Wednesday. Finally, just hours before the auction, Christie’s announced it was withdrawing the painting because “of eleventh-hour claims” that cast a “cloud of doubt” over title to the painting. The painting was estimated sale at $40 to $60 million. This means that if the painting were sold at say $50 million (all the other works sold exceeded their estimates), Christie’s lost $6 million, or its 12% commission (the lower commission charged for expensive works).
Also part of Wednesday’s auction were five Gustav Klimts that were the subject of a 2004 Supreme Court case, Austria v. Altmann, 541 U.S. 677. In that case, Adele Bloch-Bauer, the subject of one of the paintings, willed the paintings to the Austrian Museum upon her husband’s death. She died, the WWII ensued and the paintings were seized by the Nazis. After the war, her husband willed them to their nieces and nephews. The Supreme Court ruled that the 1976 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act could be applied retroactively to Altmann’s case, thus paving the way for Altman to sue the Austrian Government in US Courts. In April of this year, the Austrian National Gallery was compelled by a national arbitration board to return the five paintings to Maria Altmann, the niece of the original owner. On Wednesday night, the portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer sold for $87.9 million, a Klimt record and almost double its estimate. The room reportedly exploded in applause.
Still another work in Wednesday’s auction was the subject of a legal dispute. “Berliner Strassenszene” by Ernst Ludwig Kirchner was only recently was turned over to the heirs of Jewish shoe factory owner Alfred Hess by the Bruecke-Museum in Berlin, where it hung since 1980. In that dispute, Hess’ widow contended she was intimidated into bringing the painting back to Germany from safety in Switzerland.
November 10, 2006 at 5:20 pm
Posted in: Culture, Current Events, Law and Humanities, Property Law, Supreme Court
Print This Post
Responses (7)
Gary Hopkins - November 11, 2006 at 9:27 pm
Few years ago a Rembrand came to auction here in Eastern Canada,now a -Picasso is coming up for auction in Spring thats been in private hands since Cira 1920.While these are bringing staggering prices to consignors-Picassos contemporary artists are bringing $50,000-up.Its a great time to buy.
Portrait Artist - November 27, 2006 at 3:44 am
I have seen in one ad that there’s one Picasso painting stolen by someone from a gallery. At another ad one of Picasso’s paintings was damaged by the person who bought it and then due to the damage done the painting in return was sold at a higher price. And now, here is another ad that is about Picasso’s painting being sold in an auction. What’s going on? It seems that the paintings which were once considered to be priceless are now treated like one-of-the-many.
John
Gary Hopkins - August 27, 2007 at 2:15 pm
Picasso done many major works,12,I know of has brought between $75,000,000…….$104,000,000.Serious collectors-n-investors are buying these up,when this happens,it brings all prices up on Art across the board.
Lawyers Tatham - November 22, 2009 at 10:51 am
Wonderful art. How did you collect this nice scretch?
jewelry auction - June 23, 2010 at 1:57 pm
Short story about Nazi and the beutiful design is present here beautifully. I like it very much.keep posting like this article.
Seized Jewelry - September 2, 2010 at 4:51 am
First of all, LOVE the photos!
That was a great post. I will have to bookmark this site so I can read it later.
sc2 - October 23, 2010 at 12:55 am
That is cool, i love the old photo too.
Leave a Reply