<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Generic Political Parties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/10/generic_politic.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/10/generic_politic.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hpl</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/10/generic_politic.html/comment-page-1#comment-56902</link>
		<dc:creator>hpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/10/generic-political-parties.html#comment-56902</guid>
		<description>In Austria, in April 2005 the &quot;Freiheitliche Partei&quot; (FPÖ, usually translated as &quot;Freedom Party&quot;) split in two. The breakaway part, somewhat awkwardly named (BZÖ), found out that &quot;brand recognition&quot; was a severe problem and so tried to start using the word &quot;freiheitlich&quot; again in the run up to yesterday&#039;s parliamentary election. The courts were called in (by the &quot;original&quot; Freedom Party) and issued an injunction - the use of the word &quot;freiheitlich&quot; by the breakaway-party was considered an illegal breach of the original party&#039;s right of name.

However, for the ballots, the elctoral commissions deciding on the &quot;ballot-design&quot; accepted the term &quot;freiheitlich&quot; as a descriptive adjective also for the breakaway party. Four distinguished law professors were called in to prepare expertises for the electoral commissions on this issue - and in the end three of these professors are currently being sued by the Freedom Party for allegedly providing false expertise; needless to say, the professors have retaliated filing suits against the party, and so the courts will be hearing &quot;right of name&quot;-cases (and associated claims) for some time to come.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Austria, in April 2005 the &#8220;Freiheitliche Partei&#8221; (FPÖ, usually translated as &#8220;Freedom Party&#8221;) split in two. The breakaway part, somewhat awkwardly named (BZÖ), found out that &#8220;brand recognition&#8221; was a severe problem and so tried to start using the word &#8220;freiheitlich&#8221; again in the run up to yesterday&#8217;s parliamentary election. The courts were called in (by the &#8220;original&#8221; Freedom Party) and issued an injunction &#8211; the use of the word &#8220;freiheitlich&#8221; by the breakaway-party was considered an illegal breach of the original party&#8217;s right of name.</p>
<p>However, for the ballots, the elctoral commissions deciding on the &#8220;ballot-design&#8221; accepted the term &#8220;freiheitlich&#8221; as a descriptive adjective also for the breakaway party. Four distinguished law professors were called in to prepare expertises for the electoral commissions on this issue &#8211; and in the end three of these professors are currently being sued by the Freedom Party for allegedly providing false expertise; needless to say, the professors have retaliated filing suits against the party, and so the courts will be hearing &#8220;right of name&#8221;-cases (and associated claims) for some time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

