Comments on: Concurring Opinions Reader Poll

By: mmf

mmf — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:29:11 +0000

Hmmm, which Supreme Court Justice is NOT a reader????

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:51:58 +0000

How is “Wannabe Law Professor” a separate category? Presumably a whole lot of the Lawyers (Private Sector) and Law Students could also pick that category; I know I could.

By: stefan

stefan — Sat, 14 Oct 2006 02:40:05 +0000

I was going to argue that ‘business person’ — yes, that seems to be me — is too broad, but there are so far only 3% of respondents in the category. How about an ex-academic category? I didn’t make tenure and was forced to do the same work for more money in the for-profit sector. I even get to ‘teach’ recent college graduates. No publishing anymore, but that was always a drag anyway.

By: Sandra Day O'Connor

Sandra Day O'Connor — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:32:52 +0000

What, no category for Retired Supreme Court Justice?

By: John Armstrong

John Armstrong — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:34:35 +0000

Is “Mathematics” in “Computer Science & Technology”?

By: Cathy

Cathy — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:32:42 +0000

You have no category for “not still a law student but not yet a lawyer.” What are we, chopped liver?

(I mean, that’s how we often feel, but did you really need to rub it in demographically?)

By: Jim Milles

Jim Milles — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:18:58 +0000

You also forgot to include “Law Librarian.”

By: Vasu

Vasu — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:20:36 +0000

I can’t believe you don’t have an “Engineer” category. Its so much better than a “Technologist”