« Law Review Submissions, Final August Version | Main | Now Playing in a Bankruptcy Court Near You »
August 17, 2006
NSA Surveillance and the First Amendment
Earlier today, a federal district judge struck down the Bush Administration's NSA surveillance program which involved intercepting international electronic communications without a warrant. The opinion is available here. I have not had time to read the opinion carefully yet, but I am especially intrigued by the court's use of the First Amendment as one of the grounds to invalidate the program. I just completed an article entitled The First Amendment as Criminal Procedure in which I argue for First Amendment regulation of government information gathering. In the final section, I have a discussion of the NSA surveillance program.
The court's First Amendment analysis is very brief, and I agree with Jack Balkin who observes that the "first amendment holding is novel although plausible, but it is not supported by very good arguments." The First Amendment argument is indeed a difficult and complex one and it deserves more than just a few pages to develop. My article attempts to flesh out the First Amendment argument. Here's the abstract:
This article explores the relationship between the First Amendment and criminal procedure. These two domains of constitutional law have long existed as separate worlds, rarely interacting with each other. But many instances of government information gathering can implicate First Amendment interests such as freedom of speech, association, and religion. The Fourth and Fifth Amendments used to provide considerable protection for First Amendment interests, as in the famous 1886 case, Boyd v. United States, where the Supreme Court held that the government was prohibited from seizing a person's private papers. Over time, however, Fourth and Fifth Amendment protection shifted, and now countless searches and seizures involving people's private papers, the books they read, the websites they surf, the pen names they use when writing anonymously, and so on fall completely outside of the protection of constitutional criminal procedure. Professor Solove argues that the First Amendment provides protection against government information gathering implicating First Amendment interests. He contends that there are doctrinal, historical, and normative justifications to develop what he calls “First Amendment criminal procedure.” Solove sets forth an approach to determine when certain instances of government information gathering fall within the regulatory domain of the First Amendment and what level of protection the First Amendment should provide.
I welcome any comments. Eugene Volokh has some interesting analysis of the court's First Amendment analysis here.
Posted by Daniel J. Solove at August 17, 2006 04:38 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1190.
Comments
This is so timely, everyone should download it twice!
Posted by: Orin Kerr at August 17, 2006 07:53 PM
I can't believe it -- for once, Orin and I agree!
Posted by: Daniel J. Solove at August 17, 2006 08:01 PM
