Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search


Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

jr_114_9780195367195_bnr

jr_114_9780195383768_bnr

advertise-here4


FC-CO(SS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Mike Zimmer on From the other side at AALS . . .

    • Mike Zimmer on The Employer’s Strategy in Gross v. FBL Financials

    • Mike Zimmer on Drafting the 28th Amendment

    • M.G.M on Drafting the 28th Amendment

    • A.J. Sutter on Lawyers: Don’t Trade on Inside Information!

    • No Load Funds on Consumer Financial Product Safety?

    • grad student on Princeton and the Behavioral Revolution

    • Anon321 on The Passive Voice in Statutory Interpretation

    • Steven Kaminshine on The Employer’s Strategy in Gross v. FBL Financials

    • Alex Kreit on Politicians: Have you talked to your constituents about drug policy?

    • Alex Kreit on Election Night 2009

    • mikeb302000 on Election Night 2009

    • Neal Goldfarb on The Passive Voice in Statutory Interpretation

    • Orin Kerr on Politicians: Have you talked to your constituents about drug policy?

    • MYarnell on Curricular Reform Revisited

  •  

    Site Meter

Law Review Submissions, Final August Version

posted by Dave Hoffman

question2.jpgContinuing Co-Op’s tradition of law review related public service, I thought I’d open up a space for law review editors to provide some information to folks thinking of submitting in the next “cycle”. (Kaimi has a post up for law reviews that want off-cycle submisssions).

[Update: I started this thread back in June. It is now August, and I assume the window of submissions is fully open. Editors should feel free to use the comment thread to make any submissions related announcements they deem relevant and useful.]


 August 16, 2006 at 7:00 pm   Posted in: Law School, Law School (Law Reviews)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (11)

  1. YLJ Articles Editor - June 19, 2006 at 3:37 pm

    Yale is reading articles all summer, and will begin making publication offers again in August. We’ll be taking at least 6-8 more articles.

    High-quality scholarship is more important than filling any particular quota.

  2. Arizona Law Review Editor - June 19, 2006 at 9:24 pm

    The Arizona Law Review will begin reading submissions and making offers again in mid-August. We still have room for 3-4 articles next year.

    We are not looking for articles on any particular subject. Instead, no matter the topic, we seek articles that are interesting, timely, and well written.

  3. HLR Articles Editor - June 20, 2006 at 8:46 am

    Harvard will be looking at articles all summer, although our turnaround will be faster starting August 14. We have room for several more articles (at least 5, depending on their length). We are not looking for articles in particular topic areas.

  4. Editor-in-Chief, Cardozo Law Review - June 20, 2006 at 9:51 am

    The Cardozo Law Review considers a limited number of high-quality submissions during the summer months and begins reviewing full-time in mid-August.

    The Cardozo Law Review has developed a reputation for publishing a wide variety of more esoteric and theoretical pieces and will continue to be on the lookout for those. We’d like to balance this by publishing a few empirical pieces, a relative rarity in legal academia.

    We will be accepting approximately 6-9 articles in the next cycle.

  5. Minn Articles Editor - June 22, 2006 at 4:23 pm

    Minnesota Law Review is reviewing articles all summer, though we our turn-around will be faster starting in August. We have space for 4-6 articles.

    We have no criteria regarding the subject matter of the articles. Strong writing and insightful, compelling scholarship will go a long way with us.

  6. Duke Law Journal - June 26, 2006 at 10:26 am

    Duke Law Journal is reviewing articles throughout the summer and accepting electronic submissions until August 1. We have room for four or so articles, depending on length. All topics are welcome. We are also working on a call for papers for our Administrative Law Conference, which will be held in early 2007.

    Finally, we’re happy to report that after a stretch of behind-schedule publication, we will be on time for Volume 56.

  7. Hastings Law Journal - July 17, 2006 at 11:23 pm

    The Hastings Law Journal is reviewing submissions throughout the summer and will begin making publication decisions in the second week of August.

    We are looking for five pieces to complete Volume 58, and for those slots we welcome articles of any topic. Additionally, scholars interested in presenting at and/or submitting papers for our upcoming Disability Law Symposium should contact our Senior Symposium Editor.

  8. Editor-in-Chief, Boston University Law Review - July 18, 2006 at 12:39 am

    Boston University Law Review is now accepting article submissions, and will start making publication decisions (and accepting expedited review requests) in mid-August.

    We are looking for approximately six articles, depending on length. All topics are welcome. Email submissions (along with cover letter and CV) to lawrev@bu.edu.

  9. Articles Department, Washington University Law Review - August 2, 2006 at 11:22 am

    The Washington University Law Review (formerly Washington University Law Quarterly) is currently reviewing article submissions.

    We will be accepting at least 9 articles for our next publication cycle. Please email submissions with a cover letter and CV to review@wulaw.wustl.edu.

    All topic areas are considered.

  10. tim zinnecker - August 16, 2006 at 9:50 pm

    Query whether a submission should be accompanied by the author’s c.v. If so, why?

  11. bill - August 17, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    “Query whether a submission should be accompanied by the author’s c.v. If so, why?

    Posted by: tim zinnecker at August 16, 2006 09:50 PM”

    Otherwise the editors would have to read all the submissions. That’d suck.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page

Solangel Maldonado

Website
SSRN Page

Gerard Magliocca

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Rachel Godsil
Alex Kreit
Anita Krishnakumar
Matthew Sag
Michael Zimmer






Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Frank Wu
Corey Yung
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress