<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright and Bar Exam Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/08/copyright_and_b.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/08/copyright_and_b.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:10:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clvarallo</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/08/copyright_and_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-57253</link>
		<dc:creator>clvarallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/08/copyright-and-bar-exam-questions.html#comment-57253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been in practice a long time and I&#039;m licensed in 3 jurisdictions - soon to be 4 if all goes well this July &#039;07.  PMBR is by far the best MBE review course I&#039;ve taken, because of the number of practice questions.  By the time you get to the exam you&#039;re proficient with (1) time management; (2) legal nuances and distinctions; (3)confidence.  There may be a few answers that can go either way in the materials, but it&#039;s usually because the Bar Examiners sometimes give credit for two answers.  I would recommend it to any individual studying for the bar exam.  And for the guy who was thinking of not taking a review course, that&#039;s just plain stupid.  Even if it&#039;s not PMBR, you&#039;ve gotta take a review course.

CLV

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been in practice a long time and I&#8217;m licensed in 3 jurisdictions &#8211; soon to be 4 if all goes well this July &#8216;07.  PMBR is by far the best MBE review course I&#8217;ve taken, because of the number of practice questions.  By the time you get to the exam you&#8217;re proficient with (1) time management; (2) legal nuances and distinctions; (3)confidence.  There may be a few answers that can go either way in the materials, but it&#8217;s usually because the Bar Examiners sometimes give credit for two answers.  I would recommend it to any individual studying for the bar exam.  And for the guy who was thinking of not taking a review course, that&#8217;s just plain stupid.  Even if it&#8217;s not PMBR, you&#8217;ve gotta take a review course.</p>
<p>CLV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/08/copyright_and_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-57252</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/08/copyright-and-bar-exam-questions.html#comment-57252</guid>
		<description>My sense of the opinion is that the judge found the course promoters quite distasteful, and wanted to put them out of business.

I thought the weakest part was the damages section, where he just plucks from nowhere a notion that 1/3 of PMBR&#039;s revenues were due to the 100 or so substantially similar questions.

Admittedly, PMBR apparently did not submit good information on the companies&#039; books.  But it seems to me that this is a case where statutory damages are far more appropriate than an &quot;accounting of profits.&quot;  He could easily have gotten to the $11 million figure by fining them $100,000 per question.

FWIW, I have a post on this today at madisonian.net.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sense of the opinion is that the judge found the course promoters quite distasteful, and wanted to put them out of business.</p>
<p>I thought the weakest part was the damages section, where he just plucks from nowhere a notion that 1/3 of PMBR&#8217;s revenues were due to the 100 or so substantially similar questions.</p>
<p>Admittedly, PMBR apparently did not submit good information on the companies&#8217; books.  But it seems to me that this is a case where statutory damages are far more appropriate than an &#8220;accounting of profits.&#8221;  He could easily have gotten to the $11 million figure by fining them $100,000 per question.</p>
<p>FWIW, I have a post on this today at madisonian.net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LM</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/08/copyright_and_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-57251</link>
		<dc:creator>LM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/08/copyright-and-bar-exam-questions.html#comment-57251</guid>
		<description>James, I&#039;m intrigued by your comment (&quot;review courses feed you wrong answers&quot;). I&#039;ve heard/read this from others as well. Being as it is that I&#039;ll be taking the bar in less than a year from now, I have to ask: if bar review courses commonly provide the wrong answers, thereby making the bar exam study process that much more difficult, should students even consider taking a review course? Or would we be better off saving our money for review books purchased on e-bay and a nice post-bar exam vacation?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I&#8217;m intrigued by your comment (&#8221;review courses feed you wrong answers&#8221;). I&#8217;ve heard/read this from others as well. Being as it is that I&#8217;ll be taking the bar in less than a year from now, I have to ask: if bar review courses commonly provide the wrong answers, thereby making the bar exam study process that much more difficult, should students even consider taking a review course? Or would we be better off saving our money for review books purchased on e-bay and a nice post-bar exam vacation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Sharfman</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/08/copyright_and_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-57250</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sharfman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/08/copyright-and-bar-exam-questions.html#comment-57250</guid>
		<description>This is fascinating, Dan. I wonder if there&#039;s any copyright as well in candidate answers. The examiners seem to have no problem making model answers available without getting a copyright waiver from the author. Perhaps this case will change things, since it&#039;s hard to see a compelling distinction as a matter of copyright between exam questions and answers.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fascinating, Dan. I wonder if there&#8217;s any copyright as well in candidate answers. The examiners seem to have no problem making model answers available without getting a copyright waiver from the author. Perhaps this case will change things, since it&#8217;s hard to see a compelling distinction as a matter of copyright between exam questions and answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Sharfman</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/08/copyright_and_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-57249</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sharfman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/08/copyright-and-bar-exam-questions.html#comment-57249</guid>
		<description>This is fascinating, Dan. I wonder of there&#039;s any copyright as well in canddiate answers. The examiners seem to have no problem making model answers available without getting a copyright waiver from the author. Perhaps this case will change things, since it&#039;s hard to see a compelling distinction as a matter of copyright between exam questions and answers.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fascinating, Dan. I wonder of there&#8217;s any copyright as well in canddiate answers. The examiners seem to have no problem making model answers available without getting a copyright waiver from the author. Perhaps this case will change things, since it&#8217;s hard to see a compelling distinction as a matter of copyright between exam questions and answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Grimmelmann</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/08/copyright_and_b.html/comment-page-1#comment-57248</link>
		<dc:creator>James Grimmelmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/08/copyright-and-bar-exam-questions.html#comment-57248</guid>
		<description>The opinion contains a number of damning statements about PMBR, including one that confirms what many students cramming for the bar exam have long suspected: &lt;i&gt;review courses feed you wrong answers&lt;/i&gt;.

At page 11, after reciting a question from the MBE and its nearly identical PMBE cousin, the opinion wryly notes:

&lt;blockquote&gt;

This question tests the same legal concept using the same fictitious statute and four virtually identical answer choices in the same order.  As with a number of PMBE questions, the answer  key here is incorrect, further undermining Mr. Feinberg’s claims that he derived his questions independently from authoritative  legal sources.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opinion contains a number of damning statements about PMBR, including one that confirms what many students cramming for the bar exam have long suspected: <i>review courses feed you wrong answers</i>.</p>
<p>At page 11, after reciting a question from the MBE and its nearly identical PMBE cousin, the opinion wryly notes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This question tests the same legal concept using the same fictitious statute and four virtually identical answer choices in the same order.  As with a number of PMBE questions, the answer  key here is incorrect, further undermining Mr. Feinberg’s claims that he derived his questions independently from authoritative  legal sources.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
