Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 


advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Most under-appreciated thing about Warren Buffett: he built Berkshire to last well beyond him.  (LAC, at BRK annual meeting via Motley Fool, here.)

University governance as a new topic of public discussion.

An unusual profile of Mary Anne Franks (kw)

Aggressive copyright litigation run amok. (fp)

USA Today's Matt Krantz quoting me on Warren Buffett joining Twitter.  (LAC)

Private prisons? Why, sure! What could possibly go wrong? (kw)

TNR profiles Susan Crawford (kw)

Berkshire Hathaway is bigger than Warren Buffett.  Manual of Ideas (LAC).

Guns don't shoot people, kitchen appliances shoot people (kw)

Via Glom, Sat Eve Post review of The Essays of Warren Buffett.


Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Bruce Boyden on Tumblr, Porn, and Internet Intermediaries

    • Orin Kerr on The Varying Use of Legal Scholarship by the U.S. Supreme Court across Issues

    • Guy Spier on Symposium Redux: Essays and Lessons

    • John Mihaljevic on Is Berkshire Hathaway Really a Psychology Experiment?

    • Sy Lorne on The Many Audiences of Buffett's Letters

    • Lawrence Cunningham on The Skeptical Principal

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Berkshire's Dividend Policy: Part II

    • Lawrence Cunningham on The Many Audiences of Buffett's Letters

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Deals without Bankers: Salomon and Benjamin Moore

    • Brett Bellmore on National Referenda

    • Gerard Magliocca on National Referenda

    • mls on National Referenda

    • David Schwartz on The Varying Use of Legal Scholarship by the U.S. Supreme Court across Issues

    • Patrick S. O'Donnell on Warren Buffett: Practical Philosopher of Capitalism

    • Ken Shubin Stein on Is Berkshire Hathaway Really a Psychology Experiment?
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Law School Prep Courses

posted by Dave Hoffman

law1950jpgAre law school prep courses a waste of money?

My gut says yes. But the distributed wisdom of pre-law students, who are driving a growth in these courses, says no. The author of my casebook apparently endorses the concept, as do many other accomplished teacher-scholars.

I poked around the ‘net, and couldn’t find any empirical evidence one way or another on the utility of taking a prep course in achieving its goal: raising student’s grades. (Of course, such data would be very hard to find for non-prep-takers). My intuition, which I’m willing to yield to evidence, is that prep courses are for most consumers a bad buy. Here’s why:

1. Such courses generally seem to focus on teaching the substance of the first-year. For a small minority of students, comfort with substance may help to ameliorate anxieties in the first-semester, but I don’t think that it will likely lead to higher grades. Grading in law school, to the extent that it is rational, is tied closely to the skill of taking a particular professor’s exam. That skill is partly a method problem, and partly a product of absorbing the professor’s approach to legal reasoning. That is, since law is a predictive enterprise, better exam answers usually (at least to me) predict the law in ways reflected from classroom discussion. Most of the time, you won’t be able to learn that from an outline, and you won’t be able to learn that from some other professor, no matter how gifted, six months before the fact.

2. Students who take prep courses are likely to be more motivated than the norm, and possibly more organized. (Their non-prep compatriots either didn’t think about this potential success route, or did think about it and missed the deadline.) Such students don’t need help.

3. The courses are exceedingly short. How much law can you process in a week? (You may respond that Barbri is short, but (1) Barbri creates a network effect of success, because the Bar is a curved exam; and (2) Barbri isn’t that short; and (3) I won’t hear anything bad about Barbri, the most rewarding law education experience I’ve ever had.)

Are these intuitions right? At some level, I may be resisting the idea of preparatory courses because I want my view of contract law to the first that my students hear, and because I don’t want students to add to their already crushing debt load in an attempt to marginally improve their chances at a better grade.

That said, a prep course can’t hurt you. It is a matter of the opportunity cost of your time, and the actual cost of the course. My advice if you have time and money to spare: buy your loved ones gifts to ease the strain ahead; invest in good lighting for your study area; and use the time to get a healthy tan at the beach.


 July 11, 2006 at 12:09 am   Posted in: Law School   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (11)

  1. Anthony - July 11, 2006 at 3:18 am

    “That said, a prep course can’t hurt you.”

    Oh, it definitely can hurt you if it lulls you into a false sense of security, or teaches you methods that aren’t applicable to your particular school/professor.

  2. Laz - July 11, 2006 at 7:49 am

    I’d be willing to bet that there is in fact a negative correlation between taking a law school prep course and getting top grades (at least at tier 1 schools). Plus, I can’t imagine a more effective way to annoy your classmates than revealing that, yes, you already know what promissory estoppel is because you studied it in your prep course.

  3. anon - July 11, 2006 at 3:01 pm

    there’s a lot of money to be made on fear and anxiety.

  4. theimbroglio - July 12, 2006 at 2:01 am

    I won’t hear anything bad about Barbri, the most rewarding law education experience I’ve ever had.

    Um, really?

  5. Amber - July 13, 2006 at 1:43 pm

    Even if people don’t take a prep class, they should be strongly encouraged to read some brief treatment of economic thought (and maybe statistics) before the 1L year. Nothing is more agonizing than listening to a bunch of English majors in a torts class who don’t understand anything about incentives or probabilities.

  6. Paul Gowder - July 14, 2006 at 9:38 am

    Except, of course, listening to a bunch of economics majors who think the whole world is the nail for their hammer.

  7. Uhu - July 25, 2006 at 3:43 pm

    What about prep courses that last 8 weeks in the summer time?

  8. Nazli - April 29, 2007 at 8:34 pm

    Are Barbri prep. courses available in Oman?

  9. Guy - July 19, 2010 at 9:04 pm

    There’s a hilarious Barbri parody video on YouTube where the teacher keeps singing acronyms for laws and such.
    There are longer classes like The Center for Legal studies which has a 7 week course. By the way, Law Preview provides data- albeit biased data- about students consistently scoring in the top 20% or so (you were saying you couldn’t find any data- sorry to not be exact statistics guy ^^ ). Probably the motivation factor but if the data’s accurate, it seems to show that it does’t hurt people (yeh I know correlation doesn’t necessitate causation) . They also have hundreds of testimonials so you could read those. Number 3 doesn’t make any sense- just sayin.

  10. Laura - June 21, 2011 at 12:02 am

    You all missed the point of the prep courses. Those people were the only people who taught me the proper way to brief cases, outline, choose among hornbooks, and prepare for and author an exam. They used 1L topics as illustrations since those were the classes we were going to take, but the whole point of the course was to teach us to see the forest through the trees. The goal of these courses isn’t to give you a substantive edge, if you’re that kind of gunner you can just pre-read hornbooks or something. The point is they teach you how to do law school, wtf is an outline, a case brief, and how are exams different from cold calls.

  11. Arlen - November 13, 2012 at 12:03 am

    Hey I dont want to be a jerk after you wrote that long article.. However that is very very erroneous. I am a 1L.. I am so screwed its not even funny.. this is why..

    1. I do not know how to IRAC for exams, forget about issue spotting and law/fact analysis!!
    2.I did NOT understand time management,
    3.I DID NOT know about the Barbri exam prep before Jan15 (extra $1000)
    4. I did not get my bar prep backgound info ready now it will be late and after my classmates
    5. I did not know about book discounts or to wait till classes started.
    6. the competitiveness of our section
    7. importance of balance
    8. exam prep
    9. how to create an outline
    10 many many many more inside things that you are expected to know that screw up your time you could be studying.. not to mention all the things that have cost me money, stress time and anxiety…

    I ask in the most respectful way… How could you dare post this???????!

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Kelli A. Alces
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ryan Calo
Claire Hill
Jay Kesten
William McGeveran
Meredith Render
Aaron Saiger
David L. Schwartz
Olivier Sylvain
Charles K. Whitehead
Aaron Zelinsky


















Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Derek Bambauer
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Khiara Bridges
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Gabriella Coleman
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
andré douglas pond cummings
Allison Danner
Laura DeNardis
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Susan Freiwald
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Vivian E. Hamilton
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Angela Harris
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Tayyab Mahmud
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Janai Nelson
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
David Opderback
David Orentlicher
Michael O'Shea
Kristen Osenga
Mary-Rose Papandrea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
William Reynolds
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Brishen Rogers
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schleicher
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Lea Shaver
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Peter Swire
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Joseph Turow
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
Privacy and Security Training
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress