<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justice Kennedy Swinging Left?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/justice_kennedy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/justice_kennedy.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunch-break Winfield</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/justice_kennedy.html/comment-page-1#comment-58055</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunch-break Winfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/07/justice-kennedy-swinging-left.html#comment-58055</guid>
		<description>Prof. Penalver,

As you say, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Justice Kennedy still sides with his more conservative bretheren most of the time.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; For this reason, focusing on Justice Kennedy seems, to me, mistaken. The votes of the other liberals most often correlate to Souter; the votes of the other conservatives, including Kennedy as a conservative, most often correlate to Alito. Thus, this is the Souter-Alito Court, not the Kennedy Court. As the example of &lt;i&gt;Clark v. Arizona&lt;/i&gt; illustrates, if one has Souter and Alito, one can obtain a viable majority without Kennedy.

Looking forward to the book.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof. Penalver,</p>
<p>As you say, <i>&#8220;Justice Kennedy still sides with his more conservative bretheren most of the time.&#8221;</i> For this reason, focusing on Justice Kennedy seems, to me, mistaken. The votes of the other liberals most often correlate to Souter; the votes of the other conservatives, including Kennedy as a conservative, most often correlate to Alito. Thus, this is the Souter-Alito Court, not the Kennedy Court. As the example of <i>Clark v. Arizona</i> illustrates, if one has Souter and Alito, one can obtain a viable majority without Kennedy.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

