http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/froomkins_law_r.html The Law, the Universe, and Everything Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:19 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3 hourly 1 http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/froomkins_law_r.html/comment-page-1#comment-57622 Matt Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:33:22 +0000 http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/07/froomkins-law-review-copyright-wiki.html#comment-57622 Ha, I should have read the rest of the Wiki. They already have several. Sorry. Ha, I should have read the rest of the Wiki. They already have several. Sorry.

]]> http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/froomkins_law_r.html/comment-page-1#comment-57621 Matt Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:30:56 +0000 http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/07/froomkins-law-review-copyright-wiki.html#comment-57621 One thing that might be useful is for Froomkin and similarly-minded academics to write a public-domain standard form of law journal publication agreement. I negotiated an agreement with a law review and had no idea whether what I was asking for was reasonable or "market" ... so I ended up calling a couple of people who were MEs at my law review when I was in law school for advice (and for our law review's form of contract). If authors had a standard form containing provisions that many journals actually agree to, that would be a good step toward convincing other journals to go along. One thing that might be useful is for Froomkin and similarly-minded academics to write a public-domain standard form of law journal publication agreement. I negotiated an agreement with a law review and had no idea whether what I was asking for was reasonable or “market” … so I ended up calling a couple of people who were MEs at my law review when I was in law school for advice (and for our law review’s form of contract). If authors had a standard form containing provisions that many journals actually agree to, that would be a good step toward convincing other journals to go along.

]]>