<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chart of Law Review Submission Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/chart_of_law_re.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/chart_of_law_re.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/chart_of_law_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-57646</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/07/chart-of-law-review-submission-policies.html#comment-57646</guid>
		<description>I free-ride off postings like Dan&#039;s often enough that on the rare occasion I put together something useful for others, I figure I should share....

Someone emailed me a question that indicated I should clarify something: I listed &quot;ExpressO&quot; only for five journals, but it&#039;d also work fine for the many that want &quot;mail&quot; submissions (because ExpressO does hard-copy mailings).  And I don&#039;t have any basis for knowing the extent to which journals really discriminate against articles that don&#039;t follow their exact preferences for 1.5 spacing, 1.185&quot; margins, etc....

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I free-ride off postings like Dan&#8217;s often enough that on the rare occasion I put together something useful for others, I figure I should share&#8230;.</p>
<p>Someone emailed me a question that indicated I should clarify something: I listed &#8220;ExpressO&#8221; only for five journals, but it&#8217;d also work fine for the many that want &#8220;mail&#8221; submissions (because ExpressO does hard-copy mailings).  And I don&#8217;t have any basis for knowing the extent to which journals really discriminate against articles that don&#8217;t follow their exact preferences for 1.5 spacing, 1.185&#8243; margins, etc&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam Cherry</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/chart_of_law_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-57645</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam Cherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/07/chart-of-law-review-submission-policies.html#comment-57645</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the chart, Scott!  V. useful.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the chart, Scott!  V. useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/chart_of_law_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-57644</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/07/chart-of-law-review-submission-policies.html#comment-57644</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s cool--just wondering.  Very, very helpful list, Scot.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s cool&#8211;just wondering.  Very, very helpful list, Scot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/chart_of_law_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-57643</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/07/chart-of-law-review-submission-policies.html#comment-57643</guid>
		<description>Oh, I don&#039;t stand by the list as a ranking of anything.  It&#039;s the top 37 according solely to a photocopy of a US News ranking list I had sitting on my desk.  I don&#039;t know whether it was this year&#039;s ranking or last year&#039;s or whatever.  And I don&#039;t think much of US News&#039;s methodology at all.

Also, I certainly don&#039;t purport to be saying that these are the top 37 reviews.  For example, I didn&#039;t look at various top-ranked specialty journals -- including several that have published my articles and that I therefore think are the bestest journals ever.  I excluded specialty journals only because I initially compiled this list for my own use (the idea of sharing it came to me later), and I&#039;ll be submitting my current piece only to general law reviews (because I recently published in specialty journals in the two fields most relevant to my work, employment law and gender, so I figure my next one should go in a general).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I don&#8217;t stand by the list as a ranking of anything.  It&#8217;s the top 37 according solely to a photocopy of a US News ranking list I had sitting on my desk.  I don&#8217;t know whether it was this year&#8217;s ranking or last year&#8217;s or whatever.  And I don&#8217;t think much of US News&#8217;s methodology at all.</p>
<p>Also, I certainly don&#8217;t purport to be saying that these are the top 37 reviews.  For example, I didn&#8217;t look at various top-ranked specialty journals &#8212; including several that have published my articles and that I therefore think are the bestest journals ever.  I excluded specialty journals only because I initially compiled this list for my own use (the idea of sharing it came to me later), and I&#8217;ll be submitting my current piece only to general law reviews (because I recently published in specialty journals in the two fields most relevant to my work, employment law and gender, so I figure my next one should go in a general).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred L. Brophy</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/07/chart_of_law_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-57642</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred L. Brophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/07/chart-of-law-review-submission-policies.html#comment-57642</guid>
		<description>Dan and Scott--thanks so much for the table.  Very, very useful.

What&#039;s the measure for saying these are &quot;the top 37 law schools&#039; law reviews&quot;?  They don&#039;t appear to match either the most recent US News overall rank or the most recent US News peer assessment rank.

Again, thanks so much for the table.

Al

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan and Scott&#8211;thanks so much for the table.  Very, very useful.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the measure for saying these are &#8220;the top 37 law schools&#8217; law reviews&#8221;?  They don&#8217;t appear to match either the most recent US News overall rank or the most recent US News peer assessment rank.</p>
<p>Again, thanks so much for the table.</p>
<p>Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

