<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are so many NYC doormen men?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html/comment-page-1#comment-58453</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/06/why-are-so-many-nyc-doormen-men.html#comment-58453</guid>
		<description>If men answer the need for additional safety and security, I wonder if the property value is lower for the buildings that hire doorwomen.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If men answer the need for additional safety and security, I wonder if the property value is lower for the buildings that hire doorwomen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eh Nonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html/comment-page-1#comment-58452</link>
		<dc:creator>Eh Nonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/06/why-are-so-many-nyc-doormen-men.html#comment-58452</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t have guessed Meredith&#039;s suggestion as my first (or even second) guess.  Manhattan resident&#039;s comment about safety seems more relevant to the perceived need for door &quot;security&quot; as opposed to a function that can be satisfied by an electronic eye.

For that matter, I guess I always assumed that the safety was not so much about having an eye on the door, as providing a visible (often uniformed) male presence to dissuade would-be burglars or rapists.

If it was just an eye on the door, a camera could do it.  If it was just having the door held for you, a weight-sensitive floor mechanism would do.

It&#039;s about having Someone there.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t have guessed Meredith&#8217;s suggestion as my first (or even second) guess.  Manhattan resident&#8217;s comment about safety seems more relevant to the perceived need for door &#8220;security&#8221; as opposed to a function that can be satisfied by an electronic eye.</p>
<p>For that matter, I guess I always assumed that the safety was not so much about having an eye on the door, as providing a visible (often uniformed) male presence to dissuade would-be burglars or rapists.</p>
<p>If it was just an eye on the door, a camera could do it.  If it was just having the door held for you, a weight-sensitive floor mechanism would do.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about having Someone there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manhattan Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html/comment-page-1#comment-58451</link>
		<dc:creator>Manhattan Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/06/why-are-so-many-nyc-doormen-men.html#comment-58451</guid>
		<description>In addition to the good points above, I would add that people might feel safer when there&#039;s a man guarding their door than they would if there were an unarmed woman there.  Most bouncers are men as well.

Of course, this belief may well be silly, for lots of reasons (for example, I would bet women are perfectly able to do whatever protecting needs to be done).  But doormen are probably there in large part to make people *feel* a certain way.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the good points above, I would add that people might feel safer when there&#8217;s a man guarding their door than they would if there were an unarmed woman there.  Most bouncers are men as well.</p>
<p>Of course, this belief may well be silly, for lots of reasons (for example, I would bet women are perfectly able to do whatever protecting needs to be done).  But doormen are probably there in large part to make people *feel* a certain way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith R. Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html/comment-page-1#comment-58450</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith R. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/06/why-are-so-many-nyc-doormen-men.html#comment-58450</guid>
		<description>My guess: chivalry isn&#039;t dead.  Many men still make a point of opening doors for women and letting them on and off the elevator first, etc.  I think this explains the gender make up of doormen.  Doormen are expected to open the door for residents and assist in carrying packages.  These are chivalrous actions traditionally reserved for men -- I suspect that many (but, of course, not all) male residents in these buildings would experience daily emasculation if a female doorman (doorwoman?) opened the door for them and carried their groceries to the elevator.  It could also explain why many women wouldn&#039;t apply to be doormen.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess: chivalry isn&#8217;t dead.  Many men still make a point of opening doors for women and letting them on and off the elevator first, etc.  I think this explains the gender make up of doormen.  Doormen are expected to open the door for residents and assist in carrying packages.  These are chivalrous actions traditionally reserved for men &#8212; I suspect that many (but, of course, not all) male residents in these buildings would experience daily emasculation if a female doorman (doorwoman?) opened the door for them and carried their groceries to the elevator.  It could also explain why many women wouldn&#8217;t apply to be doormen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Millstone</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html/comment-page-1#comment-58449</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Millstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/06/why-are-so-many-nyc-doormen-men.html#comment-58449</guid>
		<description>Good question. We should perhaps ask their union Local 32B/J of the SEIU.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. We should perhaps ask their union Local 32B/J of the SEIU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html/comment-page-1#comment-58448</link>
		<dc:creator>Common sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/06/why-are-so-many-nyc-doormen-men.html#comment-58448</guid>
		<description>Probably the long night hours.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the long night hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mazzone</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/why_are_so_many.html/comment-page-1#comment-58447</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mazzone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 04:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/06/why-are-so-many-nyc-doormen-men.html#comment-58447</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know but on my summer reading list is Peter Bearman, &quot;Doormen (Fieldwork Encounters and Discoveries&quot; (2005). Bearman is a sociologist at Columbia; the book is based on his &quot;fieldwork&quot; in Manhattan.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know but on my summer reading list is Peter Bearman, &#8220;Doormen (Fieldwork Encounters and Discoveries&#8221; (2005). Bearman is a sociologist at Columbia; the book is based on his &#8220;fieldwork&#8221; in Manhattan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
