<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paging Eugene Volokh: The First Amendment in Kentucky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/paging_eugene_v.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/paging_eugene_v.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gowder</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/06/paging_eugene_v.html/comment-page-1#comment-58214</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gowder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 06:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/06/paging-eugene-volokh-the-first-amendment-in-kentucky.html#comment-58214</guid>
		<description>I assume that the basic Pickering balancing applies to government worker free speech claims on the listening end as it does on the reading end.  (Anyone know differently?)

That being the case, I&#039;d suggest that the government&#039;s productivity interest in stifling blog-browsing is stronger than stifling newspaper/political website/whatever browsing.  Blog reading, as everyone reading this comment knows, tends to get a bit addictive and time-consuming.  Clicking from blog to blog to blog, getting into discussions in the comments, etc., probably eats a lot more productive government time than reading the local headlines.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that the basic Pickering balancing applies to government worker free speech claims on the listening end as it does on the reading end.  (Anyone know differently?)</p>
<p>That being the case, I&#8217;d suggest that the government&#8217;s productivity interest in stifling blog-browsing is stronger than stifling newspaper/political website/whatever browsing.  Blog reading, as everyone reading this comment knows, tends to get a bit addictive and time-consuming.  Clicking from blog to blog to blog, getting into discussions in the comments, etc., probably eats a lot more productive government time than reading the local headlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

