<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro-Life Tax Policy &#8211; What Would Jesus Tax?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/05/prolife_tax_pol.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/05/prolife_tax_pol.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giesen</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/05/prolife_tax_pol.html/comment-page-1#comment-58968</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/05/pro-life-tax-policy-what-would-jesus-tax.html#comment-58968</guid>
		<description>A radical, Judaeo-Christian perspective on taxes can be gotten, I believe, by revisiting first principles. Experience the entire material universe independent of humanity. Premise a Creator. Presume, then, Creation. Challenge private economic gain in mere ownership of Creation because privatized economic rent of Creation alienates the rest of humanity from an equal enjoyment, as community, from the economic blessings of the gift that is Creation. A scenario for resolving the puzzle of private use of Creation without alienating fellow humanity&#039;s economic interest in the Gift of Creation is for community to collect the market rent of land (and other natural resources)as the terms of private tenure. David G

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A radical, Judaeo-Christian perspective on taxes can be gotten, I believe, by revisiting first principles. Experience the entire material universe independent of humanity. Premise a Creator. Presume, then, Creation. Challenge private economic gain in mere ownership of Creation because privatized economic rent of Creation alienates the rest of humanity from an equal enjoyment, as community, from the economic blessings of the gift that is Creation. A scenario for resolving the puzzle of private use of Creation without alienating fellow humanity&#8217;s economic interest in the Gift of Creation is for community to collect the market rent of land (and other natural resources)as the terms of private tenure. David G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/05/prolife_tax_pol.html/comment-page-1#comment-58967</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 04:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/05/pro-life-tax-policy-what-would-jesus-tax.html#comment-58967</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a losing strategy...  The religious right in Alabama is more interested in preaching intolerance than in trying to change the terms of the debate (about tax or about anything else).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a losing strategy&#8230;  The religious right in Alabama is more interested in preaching intolerance than in trying to change the terms of the debate (about tax or about anything else).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

