Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • feathered_head on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Concernicus on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Ian on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Peterk on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Robert on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Three Oranges on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Paul Robichaux on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • JR on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Jan on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Mark on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Joe on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Phil on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Lee on Lifecycles and the Firm
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Flipping the Divine Lorraine

posted by Dave Hoffman

DLH.gifOn my way to Temple Law from my home in Center City Philadelphia there sits the Divine Lorraine Hotel, famous as a symbol of the City’s ever-crumbling, once-proud glory. It sits on Broad street within view of City Hall, but has been shuttered and uninhabited for years. Now, for the third time this decade, a developer has bought the building. The last developer apparently made around a 100% profit in a little under three years (bought: $5.8 M; sold $10.1 M), riding Philly’s marvelous real estate bubble boom reasoned uptick. The purchaser reports that the project will take about five years and is “extremely likely to happen… . It seems like a lot of nothing has happened there, but everyone has advanced the ball.”

Before we get too excited about the reclamation of this landmark, recall that this is Philadelphia. It’s been over a year since the last petty-ante municipal corruption investigation, so we’re due. And I’m sure the electrician’s union will come nosing around. Moreover, the new developer appears to be making a bet that Temple will continue to increase student enrollment over the next few years, and that a few of those students will want to live somewhere cheap, compared to center city, but lively, compared to campus. This seems like a big bet to make, given recent changes on campus.

So, I’m skeptical.

But if the renovation of the hotel pays off, it would be fantastic: restoring the Divine Lorraine would be a real feather in the cap of the City. It would be the last piece of the revitalization of downtown that has been percolating over the last decade.


 May 15, 2006 at 9:23 pm   Posted in: Architecture   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (6)

  1. Liz Longstreth - May 15, 2006 at 10:35 pm

    As a lifelong Philadelphian, I encourage others to support the mini-Renaissance Center City has enjoyed over the past few years. To maintain this growth, and for developers to see the housing demand actually meet their expectations, the City has to implement some tax reforms: reduce or eliminate the business privilege tax, and reduce the city wage tax. (And quit being so corrupt!) The current tax structure is simply driving away small business and residents, thus reducing the tax base.

    http://www.philadelphiataxreform.org/index.html

    So, Professor Hoffman, I guess it’s like betting against the Eagles: you win even if they lose. But, of course, it’s always better when they win.

  2. David S. Cohen - May 16, 2006 at 12:58 pm

    I agree Dave – I think it’s a big bet as the location is sort of in an in-between no-man’s land.

    For those interested in seeing some pictures of the inside, the City Paper did a story you can read here. And, to read about one Philadelphian’s exploration of the inside of the building on his own time, check out this thread from a music message board about it. You need to register to see the pictures, I believe, but if you follow the posts from poster “passthemuffins,” you can read the account of the expedition.

  3. Salil Mehra - May 16, 2006 at 8:38 pm

    I think the higher price flips of the Divine Lorraine may actually be reasonable given what has happened in recent years. The Divine Loraine occupies a key intersection (Broad, Fairmount and Ridge) with a subway stop that is in a yet-to-be-redeveloped zone in the middle of three areas where the boom is occurring — and the DL just 3 to 6 blocks from each of these areas.

    Fairmount is now pretty gentrified as far east as 17th Street, so Broad (effectively 14th street for non-Philadelphians) is a hop, skip and jump, and the DL is maybe 6 minutes from Center City via the subway station facing it across Broad.

    Fairmount and Broad is basically a 6-point intersection with Ridge, and 3 blocks further south on Ridge the “reasoned uptick” has already reached Ridge and Spring Garden.

    Temple’s own mini-uptick is only 6 or 7 blocks north of the DL.

  4. Dee - June 28, 2006 at 7:50 pm

    I read that the Divine Lorraine is up for sale again. Here’s the link; read the second to last paragraph(http://www.preservationalliance.com/news_divine_2.php). I don’t live in Philly but most of my family does. I plan to move here after I finish grad school. I love this city and I wish it would thrive and show its potential. I’ll remain hopeful.

  5. ILoveYouDivineLorraine - August 29, 2007 at 8:44 pm

    I really hope they don’t turn the beautiful DL Hotel into some kind of student housing. Students are cool and all, but the DL deserves better than to be a transitory living space. It could be such an incredible re-hab project if the right decisions are made. It could be the very thing that allows more N. Philly rehabilitation to occur. I am all for making a percentage affordable (allowing some of the current N. Philly residents ownership and allowing brave souls willing to take the chance on the neighborhood to actually purchase there). But this should not be a low-income restoration. This building is more important than that. And please let’s not put in a bunch of ugly multicolored carpeting. It should be all monochromes. Greys, creams, whites, golds, pinks. OR reds, blacks and golds. If they would let me, I’d buy in right NOW. If anything, this could be a developed into a space for artists. Philly wants to connect the South and North sections of “The Avenue of the Arts,” what better way? Picture galleries and shops and a few restaurants (small wonderful places, not chains!) on the ground floor, and condos and art studios in the rest of the building. The DL could then serve as a landmark connection of the S. Broad Avenue of the Arts & the N. Broad Ave. That way, there would be more than just some dumb signs indicating that Philly wants the Avenue to extend North. Please let’s not let this all go to waste. Who owns this anyway, I want to work for them and help them do the Divine thing for the Lorraine!

  6. Mike - September 19, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    I was wondering the same thing. Who owns this building now? It is a beautiful building with great potential if put in the right hands (with very deep pockets).

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress