<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discrimination Law Going to the Dogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/05/discrimination.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/05/discrimination.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/05/discrimination.html/comment-page-1#comment-59035</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/05/discrimination-law-going-to-the-dogs.html#comment-59035</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very sympathetic with the pet owners described in the article.  If we&#039;re really going to put mental health needs on a parity with physical health needs, shouldn&#039;t these pets be recognized as therapy and reasonably accommodated?

Japanese researchers have had a lot of success helping the elderly by providing them with robotic (but furry) seal pups that emit cooing sounds:

http://www.temple.edu/ispr/examples/ex03_12_05.html

I know the animals may have externalities--barking, etc.  But if there&#039;s strict enforcement of rules against those types of disturbances, they should be allowed.  As for the market solution: in many urban housing markets, it&#039;s a seller&#039;s market.  (Vacancies in Manhattan are about 1% now, I think.)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very sympathetic with the pet owners described in the article.  If we&#8217;re really going to put mental health needs on a parity with physical health needs, shouldn&#8217;t these pets be recognized as therapy and reasonably accommodated?</p>
<p>Japanese researchers have had a lot of success helping the elderly by providing them with robotic (but furry) seal pups that emit cooing sounds:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.temple.edu/ispr/examples/ex03_12_05.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.temple.edu/ispr/examples/ex03_12_05.html</a></p>
<p>I know the animals may have externalities&#8211;barking, etc.  But if there&#8217;s strict enforcement of rules against those types of disturbances, they should be allowed.  As for the market solution: in many urban housing markets, it&#8217;s a seller&#8217;s market.  (Vacancies in Manhattan are about 1% now, I think.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

