the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Yale University Press

ad-logo5.jpg

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

Law-Rev-Forum-2.jpg

law-rev-contents2.jpg

Law-Prof-Blog-Census.jpg

Categories

Administrative Announcements
Administrative Law
Admiralty
Advertising
Agricultural Law
Anonymity
Antitrust
Architecture
Articles and Books
Bankruptcy
Behavioral Law and Economics
Bioethics
Blogging
Book Reviews
Capital Punishment
Civil Procedure
Civil Rights
Conferences
Constitutional Law
Consumer Protection Law
Contract Law & Beyond
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Culture
Current Events
Cyberlaw
DRM
Economic Analysis of Law
Education
Empirical Analysis of Law
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Family Law
Feminism and Gender
First Amendment
Food
Google & Search Engines
Health Law
History of Law
Humor
Immigration
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International & Comparative Law
Interviews
Jurisprudence
Law and Humanities
Law and Inequality
Law and Psychology
Law Practice
Law Professor Blogger Census
Law Rev (Boston College)
Law Rev (Boston University)
Law Rev (California)
Law Rev (Chicago)
Law Rev (Columbia)
Law Rev (Cornell)
Law Rev (Duke)
Law Rev (Emory)
Law Rev (Fordham)
Law Rev (Georgetown)
Law Rev (GW)
Law Rev (Harvard)
Law Rev (Illinois)
Law Rev (Indiana)
Law Rev (Michigan)
Law Rev (Minnesota)
Law Rev (Northwestern)
Law Rev (Notre Dame)
Law Rev (NYU)
Law Rev (Penn)
Law Rev (S Cal)
Law Rev (Stanford)
Law Rev (Texas)
Law Rev (UCLA)
Law Rev (Vanderbilt)
Law Rev (Virginia)
Law Rev (Yale)
Law Rev Contents
Law Rev Forum
Law School
Law School (Hiring & Laterals)
Law School (Law Reviews)
Law School (Rankings)
Law School (Scholarship)
Law School (Teaching)
Law Student Discussions
Law Talk
Legal Ethics
Legal Theory
Media Law
Movies & Television
Philosophy of Social Science
Politics
Privacy
Privacy (Consumer Privacy)
Privacy (Electronic Surveillance)
Privacy (Gossip & Shaming)
Privacy (ID Theft)
Privacy (Law Enforcement)
Privacy (Medical)
Privacy (National Security)
Property Law
Race
Religion
Reparations
Science Fiction
Securities
Social Network Websites
Sociology of Law
Supreme Court
Tax
Teaching
Technology
Tort Law
Web 2.0
Weird
Wiki
Wills, Trusts, and Estates

Recent Comments

Paul Gowder on An IPOD Top-10 List, and Other Diversions

Belle Lettre on An IPOD Top-10 List, and Other Diversions

John Armstrong on An IPOD Top-10 List, and Other Diversions

Archives

April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

 

« Best Of Birmingham. Food, That Is. | Main | The Election Lottery »

May 29, 2006

An IPOD Top-10 List, and Other Diversions

posted by Dave Hoffman

Steve Bainbridge recommends that celebrities, politicians, and ordinary mortals create iPOD top-10 lists by accessing their 25-most played category. It is a troublesome metric for me. I wish I, like Nick Horby, spent time thinking about what music I like. But I don't, so my iPOD tells me that I like eclectic, sometimes objectively weak, songs. But in the spirit of the news hole this holiday weekend, my top-10 list follows after the jump. Oh, and I'll throw in a few lively sites that I read in the daily surf to divert you...

My "Top 10" List:

1. New Slang (The Shins)
2. Hurt (Johnny Cash)
3. (Sittin' On The) Dock of the Bay (Otis Reading)
4. I Can See Clearly Now (Jimmy Cliff)
5. Dead Leaves and the Dirty Ground (The White Stripes)
6. The Book of Love (Magnetic Fields)
7. Bitter Tears (Magnetic Fields)
8. Run Out Pon Dem (Sizzla)
9. King Without a Crown (Matisyahu)
10. Feeling Good (Nina Simone)

No, I'm not proud of all of these. But revealed preferences don't lie. I guess Natalie Portman was right about the Shins. And, in the spirit of full disclosure, I'll admit that somewhere in the next 11-25 lurked a Green Day song, something by Kenny Rogers (you can guess what), and something by Howard Shore. Sheesh.

In other news, President Bush made explicit his perception of a connection between the Cold War and the War on Terror. Except that he believes that terrorists do not respond to normal incentive carrots and deterrence sticks:

Today, at the start of a new century, we are again engaged in a war unlike any our nation has fought before -- and like Americans in Truman's day, we are laying the foundations for victory. (Applause.) The enemies we face today are different in many ways from the enemy we faced in the Cold War. In the Cold War, we deterred Soviet aggression through a policy of mutually assured destruction. Unlike the Soviet Union, the terrorist enemies we face today hide in caves and shadows -- and emerge to attack free nations from within. The terrorists have no borders to protect, or capital to defend. They cannot be deterred -- but they will be defeated. (Applause.)
Two comments. First, MAD deterred us too - now, we're left to weak internal controls. Second, in its intra-generational, geographic, and religious scope, this is a grim message. Glenn Greenwald explains the domestic problem here. (See a contrary view of civil life here.)

The Lincoln Hall/Everest climbing story reminds me quite a bit of the Case of the Spelucean Explorers. Assume that Lincoln Hall survives, and further assume that Everest falls within the jurisdiction of a U.S. state. Can Hall sue his team? Can the estate of David Sharpe sue his team? Assume that other climbers, passing Hall who they assumed to be near-death, took air canisters and food from him. Can they be criminally prosecuted?

And finally, a ghost ship has washed ashore in the Barbados. Can Disney refrain from using the tragedy in its advertisements for its next (stale) popcorn thriller? Time will tell.

Posted by Dave Hoffman at May 29, 2006 12:01 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/892.

Comments

There's a problem with this: iPod and iTunes increment the play count every time a track starts. They also weight slightly by play count on shuffle. That means that if you've got a mediocre song that you often skip, it'll still spike in the play count.

For example Stereolab's "Vonal Declosion" comes up at a whopping 126 in my count, while second place is Herb Alpert's "Little Spanish Flea" with only 46.

Posted by: John Armstrong at May 29, 2006 01:30 AM


I think it's pretty cool that you listen to The Shins and The White Stripes. Granted, you have some "The Big Chill" type picks there, but all in all, pretty hip! (no Margaritaville by Jimmy Buffett?) I wish more law professors, particularly those that aren't of the bow tie wearing variety, would share their music preferences with their not-that-much-younger students. Maybe then we wouldn't think of you guys as old fogies! I think many students would be surprised to see that they have a bit more in common with their professors than they would like to think!

Posted by: Belle Lettre at May 29, 2006 08:33 PM


Feeling Good is not an objectively weak song! It's not as good as Wild is the Wind or I Put a Spell on You (god, I need to learn how to capitalize titles), but it's a start. :-)

Posted by: Paul Gowder at May 30, 2006 09:58 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
The Future of Reputation

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Melissa Waters

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Elaine Chiu
Dan Kahan
Sam Kamin
Michael O'Shea
Alice Ristroph






ad-logo3.jpg

blawg100_winner2.jpg

Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Craig Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Laura Heymann
Christine Hurt
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Greg Lastowka
Joseph Liu
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo PeƱalver
Neil RIchards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Paul Secunda
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Robert Tsai
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
Beltway Blogroll
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
JD2B.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian
Mirror of Justice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
Political Theory Daily Review
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member