the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Yale University Press

ad-logo5.jpg

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

Law-Rev-Forum-2.jpg

law-rev-contents2.jpg

Law-Prof-Blog-Census.jpg

Categories

Administrative Announcements
Administrative Law
Admiralty
Advertising
Agricultural Law
Anonymity
Antitrust
Architecture
Articles and Books
Bankruptcy
Behavioral Law and Economics
Bioethics
Blogging
Book Reviews
Capital Punishment
Civil Procedure
Civil Rights
Conferences
Constitutional Law
Consumer Protection Law
Contract Law & Beyond
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Culture
Current Events
Cyberlaw
DRM
Economic Analysis of Law
Education
Empirical Analysis of Law
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Family Law
Feminism and Gender
First Amendment
Food
Google & Search Engines
Health Law
History of Law
Humor
Immigration
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International & Comparative Law
Interviews
Jurisprudence
Law and Humanities
Law and Inequality
Law and Psychology
Law Practice
Law Professor Blogger Census
Law Rev (Boston College)
Law Rev (Boston University)
Law Rev (California)
Law Rev (Chicago)
Law Rev (Columbia)
Law Rev (Cornell)
Law Rev (Duke)
Law Rev (Emory)
Law Rev (Fordham)
Law Rev (Georgetown)
Law Rev (GW)
Law Rev (Harvard)
Law Rev (Illinois)
Law Rev (Indiana)
Law Rev (Michigan)
Law Rev (Minnesota)
Law Rev (Northwestern)
Law Rev (Notre Dame)
Law Rev (NYU)
Law Rev (Penn)
Law Rev (S Cal)
Law Rev (Stanford)
Law Rev (Texas)
Law Rev (UCLA)
Law Rev (Vanderbilt)
Law Rev (Virginia)
Law Rev (Wash U)
Law Rev (Yale)
Law Rev Contents
Law Rev Forum
Law School
Law School (Hiring & Laterals)
Law School (Law Reviews)
Law School (Rankings)
Law School (Scholarship)
Law School (Teaching)
Law Student Discussions
Law Talk
Legal Ethics
Legal Theory
Media Law
Movies & Television
Philosophy of Social Science
Politics
Privacy
Privacy (Consumer Privacy)
Privacy (Electronic Surveillance)
Privacy (Gossip & Shaming)
Privacy (ID Theft)
Privacy (Law Enforcement)
Privacy (Medical)
Privacy (National Security)
Property Law
Race
Religion
Reparations
Science Fiction
Securities
Social Network Websites
Sociology of Law
Supreme Court
Tax
Teaching
Technology
Tort Law
Web 2.0
Weird
Wiki
Wills, Trusts, and Estates

Recent Comments

yclipse on "America, You Lost!"

Ken Arromdee on "America, You Lost!"

Paul Gowder on "America, You Lost!"

David S. Cohen on "America, You Lost!"

Simon on "America, You Lost!"

John Armstrong on "America, You Lost!"

Bruce on "America, You Lost!"

Archives

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

 

« Retaliation Against Workers at Immigration Rallies | Main | No Longer A Nation of Miniature Coke Addicts? »

May 03, 2006

"America, You Lost!"

posted by Dave Hoffman

A Federal jury recommended a life sentence for Zacarias Moussaoui today. On the way out of the courtroom - as the spotlight began to move off of him - Moussaoui is reported to have said "America, You Lost!" Which immediately made me think of him as a combination of Nelson Muntz and Dr. Evil. Zacarias can learn about these wonderful products of our culture over the remaining span of his natural life, which he will no doubt spend pretty much alone in a supermax prison.

Commentators at National Review's the Corner, on the other hand, apparently don't see things the same way. John Podhoretz contributed the following gem:

"There is only one justifiable reason for a juror to make this choice. That juror has to believe the death penalty is wrong under any and all circumstances. To imagine that there can be any mitigating circumstance regarding Moussaoui's actual guilt is moral idiocy of the highest order.

Alas, that moral idiocy was clearly at work in the jury deliberations."

I've got to wonder why Podhoretz thinks we should bother going through the motions of a penalty trial at all?

Posted by Dave Hoffman at May 3, 2006 06:16 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/803.

Comments

I've got to wonder why we should bother going through the motions of reading "The Corner."

Podhoretz seems to have missed that the guilt phase is over. This was the penalty phase. The question wasn't whether there was a "mitigating circumstance regarding Moussaoui's actual guilt" (a/k/a reasonable doubt?), it was whether he deserved the death penalty for the crime he was found guilty of.

Posted by: Bruce at May 3, 2006 06:57 PM


Three moral idiots out of the jury. Didn't the prosecutors have some sort of influence on jury selection? What sort of idiot is it who allows a moral idiot onto a jury? </sarcasm>

Posted by: John Armstrong at May 3, 2006 07:04 PM


Perhaps Podhoretz simply doesn't think it's a justifiable reason for a juror to make this choice because they think that instead of getting a quick way out by a nice cosy lethal injection, Moussaoui should instead endure the rough justice that I imagine will be meted out out to him by the prison population daily for the rest of his life, while guards turn an appreciatively blind eye to the prisoners' activities. I think it is naive for anyone to think that Moussaoui has gotten off easily.

Or perhaps, more charitably, the jury didn't feel like making a martyr out of him? Such sentimentality, I think, is misplaced, but it might be understandable.

Posted by: Simon at May 3, 2006 09:08 PM


I actually thought the jurors sounded quite intelligent in their parsing of the mitigating factors.

Posted by: David S. Cohen at May 4, 2006 10:14 AM


I think the real idiocy is taking anything Podhoertz says seriously.

Posted by: Paul Gowder at May 4, 2006 10:33 AM


Perhaps Podhoretz simply doesn't think it's a justifiable reason for a juror to make this choice because they think that instead of getting a quick way out by a nice cosy lethal injection, Moussaoui should instead endure the rough justice that I imagine will be meted out out to him by the prison population daily for the rest of his life, while guards turn an appreciatively blind eye to the prisoners' activities. I think it is naive for anyone to think that Moussaoui has gotten off easily.

He's going to a Supermax. No other prisoners to meet with.

And if he does get transfered to a prison where he can interact with other prisoners, he's probably going to be on the top. There's lots of Islamic extremism in prisons today, for one thing. The other prisoners might consider him a hero. Likewise, the prisoners who get raped are the weak ones, not the ones who deserve it.

Since he isn't being executed, we also have to worry about other groups taking hostages in order to force the US to release him.

Posted by: Ken Arromdee at May 4, 2006 11:05 AM


For a fanatic who wanted martyrdom, denying it to him may be the best punishment.

Posted by: yclipse at May 4, 2006 06:06 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

William Birdthistle
Elaine Chiu
David Fontana
James Grimmelmann
Dan Kahan
Sam Kamin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
William McGeveran
Michael O'Shea






ad-logo3.jpg

blawg100_winner2.jpg

Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Craig Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Laura Heymann
Christine Hurt
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Greg Lastowka
Joseph Liu
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo PeƱalver
Neil RIchards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Paul Secunda
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Robert Tsai
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
Beltway Blogroll
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
Convictions
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
JD2B.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian
Mirror of Justice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
Political Theory Daily Review
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member