<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Law School Shuffle and the US News Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/the_big_law_sch.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/the_big_law_sch.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:56:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: crazy idea</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/the_big_law_sch.html/comment-page-1#comment-59771</link>
		<dc:creator>crazy idea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 18:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/03/the-big-law-school-shuffle-and-the-us-news-rankings.html#comment-59771</guid>
		<description>why don&#039;t law schools use mean LSAT, rather than median LSAT?  wouldn&#039;t mean LSAT be a more telling statistic?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why don&#8217;t law schools use mean LSAT, rather than median LSAT?  wouldn&#8217;t mean LSAT be a more telling statistic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/the_big_law_sch.html/comment-page-1#comment-59770</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/03/the-big-law-school-shuffle-and-the-us-news-rankings.html#comment-59770</guid>
		<description>Too true that it&#039;s bizarre to have so much emphasis placed on these rankings by the law school community. Perhaps people shouldn&#039;t take them so seriously.

On the other hand, GW moved up a point. Score!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too true that it&#8217;s bizarre to have so much emphasis placed on these rankings by the law school community. Perhaps people shouldn&#8217;t take them so seriously.</p>
<p>On the other hand, GW moved up a point. Score!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/the_big_law_sch.html/comment-page-1#comment-59769</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 05:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/03/the-big-law-school-shuffle-and-the-us-news-rankings.html#comment-59769</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yet the legal community and law school RANK students.&quot;

Most law schools (at least top ones) don&#039;t rank their students, or only release one or two general cutoff points (&quot;Top 25% in Section Y is a 3.4X GPA&quot; &quot;The cutoff for summa cum laude this year was 3.8X&quot;).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yet the legal community and law school RANK students.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most law schools (at least top ones) don&#8217;t rank their students, or only release one or two general cutoff points (&#8220;Top 25% in Section Y is a 3.4X GPA&#8221; &#8220;The cutoff for summa cum laude this year was 3.8X&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobius</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/the_big_law_sch.html/comment-page-1#comment-59768</link>
		<dc:creator>mobius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 04:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/03/the-big-law-school-shuffle-and-the-us-news-rankings.html#comment-59768</guid>
		<description>&quot;We love to gripe about the US News rankings -- and with good reason, for the rankings are stupid&quot;

Yet the legal community and law school RANK students... with an arbitrary forced curved of all things.

It&#039;s a stupid and hypocritical argument to say that rankings don&#039;t mean anything and then use rankings for everything else.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We love to gripe about the US News rankings &#8212; and with good reason, for the rankings are stupid&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet the legal community and law school RANK students&#8230; with an arbitrary forced curved of all things.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a stupid and hypocritical argument to say that rankings don&#8217;t mean anything and then use rankings for everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/the_big_law_sch.html/comment-page-1#comment-59767</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/03/the-big-law-school-shuffle-and-the-us-news-rankings.html#comment-59767</guid>
		<description>I mostly agree with this, but I will add that the rankings issue of US News actually costs $10, which, while still cheap, is relatively expensive for a single magazine issue.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly agree with this, but I will add that the rankings issue of US News actually costs $10, which, while still cheap, is relatively expensive for a single magazine issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
