<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justice Breyer At Alabama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/justice_breyer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/justice_breyer.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:22:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/justice_breyer.html/comment-page-1#comment-60126</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/03/justice-breyer-at-alabama.html#comment-60126</guid>
		<description>Hopefully (for those who support the importation of foreign law, at any rate), Justice Breyer was more pursuasive than he was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joink.com/homes/users/ninoville/au1-13-05.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and sucesfully overcame the overwhelming objections voiced by his colleague &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joink.com/homes/users/ninoville/aei2-21-06.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. I somehow doubt that he did (or indeed, could - and Justice Breyer is the finest mind to support the proposition, so if he can&#039;t, it hardly portends well for the idea), but I remain open to being pursuaded.

Additionally, I continue to object to Gewirtz &amp; Golder&#039;s standard for judicial activism, insofar as it is an absurd and inapt metric. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://simondodd.org/noise2signal/default.asp?view=singleentry&amp;entry=186&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Less nebulous than you&#039;d think&lt;/a&gt;, 9/23/2005, at pp.2-4.

I&#039;m not saying Justice Breyer is the bogeyman; he is a very smart, personable chap, and surely far less liberal than he is sometimes made out. But I&#039;m not sure I agree with your conclusion either, Dan.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully (for those who support the importation of foreign law, at any rate), Justice Breyer was more pursuasive than he was <a href="http://www.joink.com/homes/users/ninoville/au1-13-05.asp" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and sucesfully overcame the overwhelming objections voiced by his colleague <a href="http://www.joink.com/homes/users/ninoville/aei2-21-06.asp" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I somehow doubt that he did (or indeed, could &#8211; and Justice Breyer is the finest mind to support the proposition, so if he can&#8217;t, it hardly portends well for the idea), but I remain open to being pursuaded.</p>
<p>Additionally, I continue to object to Gewirtz &#038; Golder&#8217;s standard for judicial activism, insofar as it is an absurd and inapt metric. See <a href="http://simondodd.org/noise2signal/default.asp?view=singleentry&#038;entry=186" rel="nofollow">Less nebulous than you&#8217;d think</a>, 9/23/2005, at pp.2-4.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying Justice Breyer is the bogeyman; he is a very smart, personable chap, and surely far less liberal than he is sometimes made out. But I&#8217;m not sure I agree with your conclusion either, Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
