<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the Democrats Create a &#8220;Contract with America&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60433</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/should-the-democrats-create-a-contract-with-america.html#comment-60433</guid>
		<description>As presently constituted, the Democratic Party can&#039;t possibly do this.

The Democratic Party is cobbled together from groups of voters who have not only different values but conflicting values.  Consider same-sex marriage.  In some communities, the Democratic Party advertises itself as the proponents of same-sex marriage and a fully integrated military, while in other critical core groups within the party (black voters and FDR Democrats) would be horrified by that position.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As presently constituted, the Democratic Party can&#8217;t possibly do this.</p>
<p>The Democratic Party is cobbled together from groups of voters who have not only different values but conflicting values.  Consider same-sex marriage.  In some communities, the Democratic Party advertises itself as the proponents of same-sex marriage and a fully integrated military, while in other critical core groups within the party (black voters and FDR Democrats) would be horrified by that position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doesn'tMakeSense</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60432</link>
		<dc:creator>Doesn'tMakeSense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/should-the-democrats-create-a-contract-with-america.html#comment-60432</guid>
		<description>Republicans stand for what again?  Giving government jobs to friends and spending beyond their means?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans stand for what again?  Giving government jobs to friends and spending beyond their means?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navin</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60431</link>
		<dc:creator>navin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/should-the-democrats-create-a-contract-with-america.html#comment-60431</guid>
		<description>The Dems do need to get coherent core message together. They could transform &quot;progressive tax&quot;, &quot;pro-minority&quot; and &quot;pro-choice&quot; quite easily into Rovish/Newtish labels that resonante with the real middle and capitalize on recent unpopularity - &quot;financial opportunity and security for the rest of us&quot;, &quot;fair share taxes&quot; and &quot;personal freedom&quot; could encompass traditional Dem economic and social policies. Terrorism/defense is tougher, but perception of FEMA and Homeland Security are bad enough that something like &quot;security at home&quot; could cover reforming those and limiting foreign intervention.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dems do need to get coherent core message together. They could transform &#8220;progressive tax&#8221;, &#8220;pro-minority&#8221; and &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; quite easily into Rovish/Newtish labels that resonante with the real middle and capitalize on recent unpopularity &#8211; &#8220;financial opportunity and security for the rest of us&#8221;, &#8220;fair share taxes&#8221; and &#8220;personal freedom&#8221; could encompass traditional Dem economic and social policies. Terrorism/defense is tougher, but perception of FEMA and Homeland Security are bad enough that something like &#8220;security at home&#8221; could cover reforming those and limiting foreign intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gr</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60430</link>
		<dc:creator>gr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/should-the-democrats-create-a-contract-with-america.html#comment-60430</guid>
		<description>My latest idea is for Democrats to start calling the debt/deficit the &#039;republican birth tax.&#039; Its the tax you owe just for being born, the liabilities of the past you have to pay without having gotten any benfit. Sums up how we&#039;re screwing over the next generation.

Anyone have a direct line to the Center for American Progress?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest idea is for Democrats to start calling the debt/deficit the &#8216;republican birth tax.&#8217; Its the tax you owe just for being born, the liabilities of the past you have to pay without having gotten any benfit. Sums up how we&#8217;re screwing over the next generation.</p>
<p>Anyone have a direct line to the Center for American Progress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60429</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/should-the-democrats-create-a-contract-with-america.html#comment-60429</guid>
		<description>Well, Dan, the Dems will have to think of something better than &lt;a href=&quot;http://drudgereport.com/flash2ng.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fat jokes&lt;/a&gt;...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Dan, the Dems will have to think of something better than <a href="http://drudgereport.com/flash2ng.htm" rel="nofollow">fat jokes</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60428</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/should-the-democrats-create-a-contract-with-america.html#comment-60428</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, then, what is it that the Democrats want?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Impeachment procedings against George Bush. Of course, it&#039;s kind of hard to win an election when your platform is &quot;we think a majority of you guys picked wrong last year. Try again.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, then, what is it that the Democrats want?</p></blockquote>
<p>Impeachment procedings against George Bush. Of course, it&#8217;s kind of hard to win an election when your platform is &#8220;we think a majority of you guys picked wrong last year. Try again.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/should_the_demo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60427</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/should-the-democrats-create-a-contract-with-america.html#comment-60427</guid>
		<description>Democrats don&#039;t have a Contract With America for two main reasons.  First, Democrats are too busy pandering to insular special interests to know what they want.  Second, mainstream America doesn&#039;t want what the Democrats would likely be agreeing to.  The main Democratic ideals - more abortion, more gun control, more affirmative action, more welfare - aren&#039;t things that resonate with voters.

Of course, someone will likely say: &quot;Mike, you&#039;re wrong!  That&#039;s not what Democrats want!&quot;  To which I&#039;ll answer with this pre-emptive challenge: Well, then, what is it that the Democrats want?  After all, if the numerous (and intelligent) liberals reading this can&#039;t come up with a list that they all can agree upon, then how can anyone expect the Democratic party to do so?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats don&#8217;t have a Contract With America for two main reasons.  First, Democrats are too busy pandering to insular special interests to know what they want.  Second, mainstream America doesn&#8217;t want what the Democrats would likely be agreeing to.  The main Democratic ideals &#8211; more abortion, more gun control, more affirmative action, more welfare &#8211; aren&#8217;t things that resonate with voters.</p>
<p>Of course, someone will likely say: &#8220;Mike, you&#8217;re wrong!  That&#8217;s not what Democrats want!&#8221;  To which I&#8217;ll answer with this pre-emptive challenge: Well, then, what is it that the Democrats want?  After all, if the numerous (and intelligent) liberals reading this can&#8217;t come up with a list that they all can agree upon, then how can anyone expect the Democratic party to do so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

