Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


New Supreme Court website (DJS)

A digital-age bird man for Alcatraz?  Tweeting oneself to jail. (DJS)

NYT: How privacy vanishes online (DJS)

Orin Kerr critiques the 11th Circuit on email and the Fourth Amendment (DJS)

Identification by your germs (DJS)

Interview of Professor William Stuntz (DJS)

Professor Eric Goldman on the proposed federal Anti-SLAPP Bill (DJS)

Important advice for new profs: DO NOT make jokes (online or otherwise) about killing your students. (kw)

FTC Report: ID theft is down but overall fraud is up (DJS)

Balkin on reconciliation vs. filibuster (DJS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Keder on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Aspirant on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Gerard Magliocca on Where Things Stand

    • dave hoffman on Where Things Stand

    • ParanoidProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • editor on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Geoff Garver on A Civil Procedure Curriculum Challenge

    • David Adams on Deem and Pass

    • edi juandi on Network News Gives Up

    • Gerard Magliocca on Deem and Pass

    • PublishingProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Robert Scott Lawrence on Thoughts about choosing law school, part 4

    • anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

  •  

    Site Meter

Should the Democrats Create a “Contract with America”?

posted by Daniel Solove

contract1.jpgA common criticism of the Democrats is that although they are scoring some points when criticizing the Republicans, they are coming up empty in stating what they really stand for. I believe that there is some truth to this criticism. What surprises me is how ineffective the Democrats have often been in rallying around a basic theory; in articulating how specific policies will best advance their goals; and in selling their theory to Americans.

Back in 1994, the Republicans created the “Contract with America,” a document that set forth a list of concrete legislative goals. Perhaps it is time for the Democrats to produce their own Contract with America. I think that doing so would force the Democrats to articulate and rally around a set of concrete policy proposals that provide a clear alternative to the Republicans.

For example, I think that the Democrats need to come up with a plan for addressing security issues. When the Democrats criticize the Bush Administration for its surveillance measures, they need to also propose how they would address security without infringing upon civil liberties or abusing power. For example, they should propose more concrete plans for getting better international cooperation, tracking down loose nukes, and devising surveillance programs that are carried out with judicial oversight within the legal parameters of FISA.


 February 14, 2006 at 12:39 am   Posted in: Politics   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (7)

  1. Mike - February 14, 2006 at 1:32 am

    Democrats don’t have a Contract With America for two main reasons. First, Democrats are too busy pandering to insular special interests to know what they want. Second, mainstream America doesn’t want what the Democrats would likely be agreeing to. The main Democratic ideals – more abortion, more gun control, more affirmative action, more welfare – aren’t things that resonate with voters.

    Of course, someone will likely say: “Mike, you’re wrong! That’s not what Democrats want!” To which I’ll answer with this pre-emptive challenge: Well, then, what is it that the Democrats want? After all, if the numerous (and intelligent) liberals reading this can’t come up with a list that they all can agree upon, then how can anyone expect the Democratic party to do so?

  2. Simon - February 14, 2006 at 9:46 am

    Well, then, what is it that the Democrats want?

    Impeachment procedings against George Bush. Of course, it’s kind of hard to win an election when your platform is “we think a majority of you guys picked wrong last year. Try again.”

  3. Mike - February 14, 2006 at 3:21 pm

    Well, Dan, the Dems will have to think of something better than fat jokes…

  4. gr - February 15, 2006 at 12:45 am

    My latest idea is for Democrats to start calling the debt/deficit the ‘republican birth tax.’ Its the tax you owe just for being born, the liabilities of the past you have to pay without having gotten any benfit. Sums up how we’re screwing over the next generation.

    Anyone have a direct line to the Center for American Progress?

  5. navin - February 15, 2006 at 11:37 am

    The Dems do need to get coherent core message together. They could transform “progressive tax”, “pro-minority” and “pro-choice” quite easily into Rovish/Newtish labels that resonante with the real middle and capitalize on recent unpopularity – “financial opportunity and security for the rest of us”, “fair share taxes” and “personal freedom” could encompass traditional Dem economic and social policies. Terrorism/defense is tougher, but perception of FEMA and Homeland Security are bad enough that something like “security at home” could cover reforming those and limiting foreign intervention.

  6. Doesn'tMakeSense - February 15, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    Republicans stand for what again? Giving government jobs to friends and spending beyond their means?

  7. Clint - February 16, 2006 at 2:43 pm

    As presently constituted, the Democratic Party can’t possibly do this.

    The Democratic Party is cobbled together from groups of voters who have not only different values but conflicting values. Consider same-sex marriage. In some communities, the Democratic Party advertises itself as the proponents of same-sex marriage and a fully integrated military, while in other critical core groups within the party (black voters and FDR Democrats) would be horrified by that position.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Nate Oman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Robert Ahdieh
Lisa Fairfax
Michelle Harner
Sherrilyn Ifill
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Tuan Samahon
Alfred Yen










Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Adam Benforado
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress