Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 


advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


University governance as a new topic of public discussion.

An unusual profile of Mary Anne Franks (kw)

Aggressive copyright litigation run amok. (fp)

USA Today's Matt Krantz quoting me on Warren Buffett joining Twitter.  (LAC)

Private prisons? Why, sure! What could possibly go wrong? (kw)

TNR profiles Susan Crawford (kw)

Berkshire Hathaway is bigger than Warren Buffett.  Manual of Ideas (LAC).

Guns don't shoot people, kitchen appliances shoot people (kw)

Via Glom, Sat Eve Post review of The Essays of Warren Buffett.

Jack Coffee on Bad Plaintiffs' Counsel in M&A Deals and What Must Be Done to Break Them


Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • mls on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Shag from Brookline on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Brett Bellmore on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part II: Superusers and Super Stories)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part I: Risks and Myths)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part II: Superusers and Super Stories)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part I: Risks and Myths)

    • Shag from Brookline on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Brett Bellmore on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Peter Strauss on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • John Duffy on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Andrew on BRIGHT IDEAS: Q&A with Bruce Schneier about Liars and Outliers

    • Joe on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • John Duffy on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Marty Lederman on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

It’s February 27. Do you know where your Articles Committee is?

posted by Kaimipono D. Wenger

Colleagues are talking about it in the hallway. How many boards have switched over? Where exactly are the windows, and when exactly is the “sweet spot” for sending a piece out?

I’m hoping to solicit some responses from our readers, in the comments to this post, to help provide our readers with the information that may help them answer those questions. Are you affiliated with a law review? Has your board turned over? If so, please indicate this in the comments. If enough readers comment, we may be able to collect some useful information. (I believe this could be useful both for the authors, who will send their pieces out at the best time, and for the editors, who will hopefully see fewer premature articles).

Details — “the West Dakota Law Review board turns over on March 1″ — are particularly appreciated. Thanks!


 February 27, 2006 at 2:50 pm   Posted in: Articles and Books   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (40)

  1. Kaimi - February 27, 2006 at 3:03 pm

    I’ll start out with one piece of information – according to an e-mail verification from yesterday, the Notre Dame board just turned over.

  2. Dave Hoffman - February 27, 2006 at 3:11 pm

    Let’s see.

    Duke is to turn over on Wednesday; Fordham isn’t accepting submissions until March 20; Columbia isn’t accepting until the beginning of March;

    NYU is “in the middle of a board transition” (as of today); most other places seem to be willing to taking pieces & expedites as usual.

  3. Anthony - February 27, 2006 at 3:27 pm

    Here’s what I have. Sources are personal contacts and/or emails from the journal after sending in a submission this past week:

    Boston College LRev, Charleston LRev, Florida State LRev, Kansas LRev, Penn LRev, Penn JLEL, Northwestern LRev, Penn JIEL, Suffolk JHBL, University of Illinois LRev, Western State University LRev, Yale Journal on Regulation, Yale Law Journal: turned over, or are otherwise accepting/rejecting/expediting submissions

    California Western LRev: submit in April

    Chapman LRev: submit after 3/20

    Fordham LRev: submit after 3/20

    Gonzaga LRev: submit after 3/25

    Nevada Law Journal: submit after 3/20

    Penn Con Law: not yet turned over, but should be very soon

    Pepperdine Law Review: submit after 3/15

    Tennessee Law Review: submit after 4/1

    Villanova Law Review: submit after 3/15

    WUSTL Quarterly: submit after 3/20

    West Virginia LRev: submit after 4/1

    Widener LRev: submit after 9/1

    Willamette LRev: submit after 6/1

    Tons of other journals (too many to name) who have not acknowledged receipt of my submission.

  4. Anthony - February 27, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    Update: just got an email from WUSTL Quarterly saying the earlier email about not accepting submissions until late March was a communication mishap, and the journal is taking submissions now and evaluating them.

  5. Alfred L. Brophy - February 27, 2006 at 6:56 pm

    The Alabama Law Review is making offers and taking expedite requests.

    Tulane will begin reviewing in mid-March.

  6. Anthony - February 27, 2006 at 7:20 pm

    A few more from this evening: American University LRev, Hamline LRev, and BYU Education & Law Journal are accepting/rejecting/expediting.

  7. jurisprude - February 27, 2006 at 7:58 pm

    George Washington Law Review just turned over.

  8. 2L - February 27, 2006 at 10:32 pm

    Arizona Law Review board just turned over.

  9. David Mader - February 28, 2006 at 1:49 am

    Dunno if I’m breaking protocol here, but Texas Law Review is in the process of turning over, and the new articles office is reading submissions.

  10. HLS Student - February 28, 2006 at 7:30 am

    Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy turns over March 13.

  11. Aaron - February 28, 2006 at 8:36 am

    University of Miami Business Law Review – April 1st; no idea about submission acceptance, etc.

  12. Laura Alexander - February 28, 2006 at 8:39 am

    The Georgetown Law Review board has turned over, and is currently reviewing submissions.

  13. Eric Muller - February 28, 2006 at 8:50 am

    The North Carolina Law Review board has just turned over. Not sure if they’re reading yet, but they’ve been appointed.

  14. ML - February 28, 2006 at 9:00 am

    SMU Law Review turns over April 2.

  15. BAP - February 28, 2006 at 9:29 am

    Washburn Law Journal–Feb. 23

  16. JH - February 28, 2006 at 9:30 am

    The Drake Law Review chose a new board on February 18 and is reviewing submissions.

  17. Robert Allen - February 28, 2006 at 9:49 am

    Houston Law Review turned over Feb. 18 and is reviewing submissions.

  18. Peter Kamarchik - February 28, 2006 at 10:14 am

    North Carolina Central University turns over March 1.

  19. JT - February 28, 2006 at 10:26 am

    Emory L.J. turns over March 7

  20. Megan - February 28, 2006 at 11:08 am

    Minn. L. Rev. has turned over and is reviewing submissions, taking expedite requests, and making offers.

  21. Alex - February 28, 2006 at 11:14 am

    NYU Law Review has chosen its new board and is accepting submissions.

  22. DK - February 28, 2006 at 11:15 am

    BU Law Review chooses a new board tonight (2/28)

  23. Dave Hoffman - February 28, 2006 at 12:01 pm

    Columbia just turned over.

    Michigan is on winter break until March 6. (A commentator at Volokh says that they are currently reading, but it wasn’t sourced.)

  24. keith - February 28, 2006 at 12:08 pm

    Arizona State; March 1.

  25. Wm & Mary L Rev - February 28, 2006 at 12:28 pm

    WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW is reading/accepting/rejecting.

  26. BK - February 28, 2006 at 12:29 pm

    Fordham’s board elections are this week, the new board will be in place by the week of 3/6 but not up to speed for a week or two after that.

  27. Temple Law Review - February 28, 2006 at 12:51 pm

    Temple Law Review just announced the new ed board yesterday; board transitions take place throughout the semester.

  28. ILP - February 28, 2006 at 1:11 pm

    The Hastings Law Journal has turned over and is reviewing submissions.

  29. Cornell Law Student. - February 28, 2006 at 1:21 pm

    Cornell Law Review, International Law Journal, and the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy have all turned over.

  30. Kaimi - February 28, 2006 at 1:30 pm

    Thank you all for your comments thus far.

    Unless I’ve miscounted, the current tally stands at:

    18 boards that have not yet turned over (but will in the next week or next few weeks).

    34 that have turned over.

    (I wasn’t sure how to categorize NYU, where conflicting responses were posted, or Temple, where the response was not a clear yes or no).

    If that pattern holds, I would conclude that the optimal time for law review submission is right now.

  31. WUSTL Articles - February 28, 2006 at 4:14 pm

    Washington University Law Review (formerly known as the Law Quarterly) is accepting submissions currently. The March 20th date was sent out in error. Our board turns over this week. Thanks for the forum.

  32. jeff - February 28, 2006 at 8:51 pm

    Univ. of Cincinnati L. Rev. starts turnover on March 1.

  33. wahoo - March 1, 2006 at 12:14 am

    The University of Virginia Law Review’s board just turned over and will be pooling pieces over spring break (March 6-10).

  34. recentgrad - March 1, 2006 at 7:57 am

    So is the unanimous consensus that “right away” is the sweet spot?

    When I was on the Georgetown L.J.–recently, but not so recently that I can speak to the current board–I’m pretty sure we continued to review articles for some months. (In fact, I’m pretty sure we saved some slots for an explicit summer round.)

    Might people be overestimating the importance of submitting now, rather than either (1) a random point in the spring, or even (2) a random point in the year, other than maybe October-February?

    (I’m not sure they are–I wasn’t on the articles committee and knew only Geo. L.J. anyway–but I’m worried that “March Madness” is both a bad idea and a little less necessary than folks think.)

    Thoughts?

  35. washerdreyer - March 1, 2006 at 10:53 am

    The person posting as Alex is presumably our outgoing Editor-in-Chief, and therefore knows of what he speaks, if you’re still trying to figure out how to classify NYU.

  36. Dave Hoffman - March 1, 2006 at 1:35 pm

    This notice comes from the BU Law Review website: “The new Board will be elected on Tuesday, Feb. 28, and we will begin accepting expedited review requests on Monday, Mar. 13.”

  37. Anthony - March 1, 2006 at 5:11 pm

    Some more updates:

    St.Mary’s Law Journal, Oklahoma City University Law Review, NYU Review of Law & Social Change, Lewis & Clark Law Review, Roger Williams Law Review, Missouri Law Review, BYU Journal of Public Law: are taking submissions and accepting/rejecting/expediting

    Utah Law Review: not taking submissions until May 1

  38. editor - March 6, 2006 at 4:14 pm

    Anthony,

    Perhaps the reason that some journals are taking so long to get back to you is that they are considering whether they want to be associated with you since you run a racist/anti-Semitic/sexist and generally abusive message board that is an embarrassment to the profession.

    HTH

    PS for those who don’t know about Anthony’s message board, check out http://www.xoxohth.com. Just search for your favorite epithet and you’ll see what many law students know about Mr. Ciolli.

  39. UCLA - March 12, 2006 at 3:32 am

    Actually, you need to go to http://www.xoxohth.com, click through to the “Law” message board and then click on “expert mode” to see the really bad racist stuff. Brian Leiter exposed this a year ago:

    http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2005/03/penn_law_studen.html

    The sad thing is that it seems Anthony Ciolli’s racist message board is just becoming more popular with law students and law school applicants over time. It seems he and his website are on the cutting-edge of the re-mainstreaming of overt racism in the legal profession.

  40. Arizona Criminal Attorney - March 12, 2006 at 2:35 pm

    Arizona Criminal Attorney

    Attorney General John Ashcroft should abolish the Executive Office forSecuring the Arizona desert was a piece of…

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Kelli A. Alces
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ryan Calo
Claire Hill
Jay Kesten
William McGeveran
Meredith Render
Aaron Saiger
David L. Schwartz
Olivier Sylvain
Charles K. Whitehead
Aaron Zelinsky


















Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Derek Bambauer
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Khiara Bridges
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Gabriella Coleman
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
andré douglas pond cummings
Allison Danner
Laura DeNardis
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Susan Freiwald
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Vivian E. Hamilton
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Angela Harris
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Tayyab Mahmud
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Janai Nelson
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
David Opderback
David Orentlicher
Michael O'Shea
Kristen Osenga
Mary-Rose Papandrea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
William Reynolds
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Brishen Rogers
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schleicher
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Lea Shaver
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Peter Swire
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Joseph Turow
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
Privacy and Security Training
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress