<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s PageRank and Google&#8217;s Justice System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/googles_pageran.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/googles_pageran.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/googles_pageran.html/comment-page-1#comment-60524</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/googles-pagerank-and-googles-justice-system.html#comment-60524</guid>
		<description>I can send you details on the SearchKing case--I think the first litigated controversy on this.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can send you details on the SearchKing case&#8211;I think the first litigated controversy on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suguruhirahara</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/googles_pageran.html/comment-page-1#comment-60523</link>
		<dc:creator>suguruhirahara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/googles-pagerank-and-googles-justice-system.html#comment-60523</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;here you can know the system of Pagerank.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~baba/wais/pagerank.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~baba/wais/pagerank.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is written in Japanese, but it&#039;s worthwhile to read through auto translate service like babel.altavista.com&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Intensive research and explanation about PageRank, which is one of the elemental technology of the most popular search engine Google.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Chinese version is also available here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kreny.com/pagerank_cn.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.kreny.com/pagerank_cn.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here you can know the system of Pagerank.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~baba/wais/pagerank.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~baba/wais/pagerank.html</a></p>
<p>This is written in Japanese, but it&#8217;s worthwhile to read through auto translate service like babel.altavista.com</p>
<blockquote><p>Intensive research and explanation about PageRank, which is one of the elemental technology of the most popular search engine Google.</p></blockquote>
<p>Chinese version is also available here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kreny.com/pagerank_cn.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kreny.com/pagerank_cn.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Brungard</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/googles_pageran.html/comment-page-1#comment-60522</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brungard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 23:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/googles-pagerank-and-googles-justice-system.html#comment-60522</guid>
		<description>On the flip side of this coin are websites that do not violate Goog TOS or guidelines yet get yanked way down by an algorithm tweak.

When a site suddenly loses 60% or 70% of the traffic it had earned by merit, the Google Justice System has earned a few demerits.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the flip side of this coin are websites that do not violate Goog TOS or guidelines yet get yanked way down by an algorithm tweak.</p>
<p>When a site suddenly loses 60% or 70% of the traffic it had earned by merit, the Google Justice System has earned a few demerits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/googles_pageran.html/comment-page-1#comment-60521</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 20:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/googles-pagerank-and-googles-justice-system.html#comment-60521</guid>
		<description>Search King rides again.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search King rides again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Goldman</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/googles_pageran.html/comment-page-1#comment-60520</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/googles-pagerank-and-googles-justice-system.html#comment-60520</guid>
		<description>Websites can be reinstated.  In some cases, a friendly call to Google does the trick.  Otherwise, Google&#039;s algorithms are generally forgiving, but it can take months to get fully indexed again.  Eric.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Websites can be reinstated.  In some cases, a friendly call to Google does the trick.  Otherwise, Google&#8217;s algorithms are generally forgiving, but it can take months to get fully indexed again.  Eric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/02/googles_pageran.html/comment-page-1#comment-60519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/02/googles-pagerank-and-googles-justice-system.html#comment-60519</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;[Y]our page may have been manually removed from our index if it didn&#039;t conform with the quality standards necessary to assign accurate PageRank. We won&#039;t comment on the individual reasons a page was removed, and we don&#039;t offer an exhaustive list of practices that can cause removal. However, certain actions such as cloaking...or setting up pages/links with the sole purpose of fooling search engines may result in permanent removal from our index. You may want to review our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quality Guidelines&lt;/a&gt; for more guidance. If you think your site may fall into this category, you might try &quot;cleaning up&quot; the page and contacting us with a re-inclusion request. &lt;b&gt;We don&#039;t make any guarantees about if or when we&#039;ll re-include your site.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/webmasters/2a.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/webmasters/2a.html&lt;/a&gt; (emphasis added). From what I&#039;ve read elsewhere on the net, once you&#039;re pulled from the index it&#039;s rather difficult to get re-included. However, it doesn&#039;t appear to be a permanent ban, necessarily.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>[Y]our page may have been manually removed from our index if it didn&#8217;t conform with the quality standards necessary to assign accurate PageRank. We won&#8217;t comment on the individual reasons a page was removed, and we don&#8217;t offer an exhaustive list of practices that can cause removal. However, certain actions such as cloaking&#8230;or setting up pages/links with the sole purpose of fooling search engines may result in permanent removal from our index. You may want to review our <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html" rel="nofollow">Quality Guidelines</a> for more guidance. If you think your site may fall into this category, you might try &#8220;cleaning up&#8221; the page and contacting us with a re-inclusion request. <b>We don&#8217;t make any guarantees about if or when we&#8217;ll re-include your site.</b></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/2a.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/webmasters/2a.html</a> (emphasis added). From what I&#8217;ve read elsewhere on the net, once you&#8217;re pulled from the index it&#8217;s rather difficult to get re-included. However, it doesn&#8217;t appear to be a permanent ban, necessarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

