« The Confirmation Hearings: A Meaningless Ritual | Main | Just Do It: Sports v.s. Academics »
January 16, 2006
The Future of Law Libraries
Via Brian Leiter, I read this post on a controversy at Tulane's Law Library. The Law Librarian Blog, after detailing recent staff and policy shifts, wonders whether the University administration is using Katrina as an excuse to do away with an independent academic law library:
So my question is do the actions at Tulane reasonably represent a sub rasa determination by relevant powers to subsume the law library into the operations of the University library, demoting it from an independent entity and transforming it into a subordinated department? The recent spate of firings looks to be designed to preshape the structure of the law library for insertion into the main library's organization.If this is true, I wonder whether Tulane would defend itself by arguing that in light of recent developments, there is less of a need for an independent law library than there used to be. Or, more provocatively, “Law Libraries. Huh. What are they good for?”
On the technological front, as underscored by this controversy about the (new) Drexel Law library (see here and here for details), some seem to believe that the internet has reduced the importance of having a law library to bind professionals to the school, and keep the school mindful of the Bar’s needs. On the academic front, I suppose that some might think that the increasing theoretical bent of the law school faculty experience, marked by changing standards for hiring and tenure, might suggest a need for a different type of scholarly support.
These arguments feel weak to me. In part, I think that the effect on technology on legal practice is overstated. Most practitioners, even those with unlimited access to Westlaw, and all scholars, need access to a good book collection to be minimally competent at their jobs. Physical law libraries also subsidize small-firm practitioners, which to my mind is to the good. Putting aside the cost of legal services, small-firms are better places to work; they increase civility in the Bar and decrease litigious behavior; and they provide the bulk of legal services to the poor.
On the academic front, there seem to be good reasons to support a federalized approach to university administration, even if we are all eventually going to be required to get PhDs. Principally, I’d be worried that University-controlled libraries would discount the value of student-edited journals, which are a necessary, unique, and valuable aspect of legal education.
Ultimately, these issues are linked inextricably to the ABA’s burdensome accreditation requirements for new law libraries. As the regs make clear, to be accredited, a school must have a law library that is somewhat independent from the University, and which possesses a pretty significant "core collection" (see here at interpretation 606-5).
As has been observed elsewhere at length, the accreditation requirements are a barrier to entry raising the cost of legal education and (ultimately) legal services. Do the civic benefits (which I also alluded to here) of law libraries exceed the burden of the accreditation requirements? I think so, but it may be that Tulane and (perhaps?) Drexel disagree.
Posted by Dave Hoffman at January 16, 2006 12:00 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/441.
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Future of Law Libraries:
» Confessions of a Stack Rat from Concurring Opinions
I've been thinking a lot, recently, about the purposes of law libraries. In part that's because of Dave Hoffman's insightful post about these institutions. The bigger reason is that I'm on the library director search committee for one of the... [Read More]
Tracked on January 23, 2006 12:23 AM
Comments
This might be a bit of a nitpick, but does "sub rasa" have a meaning not clear to the generally educated layman, or was it a confounding of "sub rosa" and "tabula rasa"?
Posted by: John Armstrong at January 16, 2006 01:21 PM
I have had only limited experience with using an integrated library (i.e., where the law-school books are found in a single university-wide library), but that experience was not favorable. The place was the University of Stockholm where I performed some legal research over a couple of days for an article. I found it difficult to navigate the library in my search for the law books (incidentally, language was not the barrier) and found that the reference librarians were not as knowledgeable about the legal resources as I would have hoped. I may have just been there on a bad weekend, so to speak. But I don't think I would be the first to recognize the value of librarians that specialize in our discipline. I would be interested to hear about anyone else's experience with integrated libraries.
Posted by: Tomas Gomez at January 16, 2006 02:10 PM
I've just posted a lengthy comment on this issue at Out of the Jungle.
Posted by: Jim Milles at January 16, 2006 02:46 PM
For an update on Tulane Law Library see
Damage Control at Tulane Law Library on Law Librarian Blog at
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/law_librarian_blog/2006/01/damage_control_.html
Posted by: Joe Hodnicki at January 23, 2006 10:56 AM
