<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Shuts Down a Blog in China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/microsoft_shuts.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/microsoft_shuts.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:31:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Farris</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/microsoft_shuts.html/comment-page-1#comment-61085</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/microsoft-shuts-down-a-blog-in-china.html#comment-61085</guid>
		<description>&quot;This action by Microsoft infringed upon my freedom of speech.&quot;

So are we talking the freedom of speech as provided by the PRC constitution, or by the Republic of Microsoft. :)

Seriously, digging a bit futher the article states:

&quot;The MSN Spaces sites are maintained on computer servers in the United States.&quot;

Well, that is more disturbing. If I as an American citizen say something negative about the PRC, will my blog be taken offline too?

What the article doesn&#039;t make clear is if the blog was deleted from a global MSN Spaces or a Chinese MSN Spaces. If they deleted the blog from a global service - that is really bad.

However, if they deleted it from a Chinese service - that just happened to locate the servers physically in the US - while that is bad, it is SOP for doing business in repressive countries. Overall I think the long term connectivity  companies like Yahoo, Google and Microsoft provide outweigh the short term harm that comes from assisting a government with censorship.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This action by Microsoft infringed upon my freedom of speech.&#8221;</p>
<p>So are we talking the freedom of speech as provided by the PRC constitution, or by the Republic of Microsoft. <img src='http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, digging a bit futher the article states:</p>
<p>&#8220;The MSN Spaces sites are maintained on computer servers in the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, that is more disturbing. If I as an American citizen say something negative about the PRC, will my blog be taken offline too?</p>
<p>What the article doesn&#8217;t make clear is if the blog was deleted from a global MSN Spaces or a Chinese MSN Spaces. If they deleted the blog from a global service &#8211; that is really bad.</p>
<p>However, if they deleted it from a Chinese service &#8211; that just happened to locate the servers physically in the US &#8211; while that is bad, it is SOP for doing business in repressive countries. Overall I think the long term connectivity  companies like Yahoo, Google and Microsoft provide outweigh the short term harm that comes from assisting a government with censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
