http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/langdell_and_th.html The Law, the Universe, and Everything Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/langdell_and_th.html/comment-page-1#comment-61052 BL Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:43:18 +0000 http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/langdell-eliot-and-the-rise-of-blogging.html#comment-61052 I am glad Professor Solove posted the link to the earlier discussion, since Mr. Oman misstates my view. My view is certainly not that all law professors should have PhDs; my view is that those purporting to do interdisciplinary work should have PhDs or the equivalent formal training in the cognate disciplines. I am glad Professor Solove posted the link to the earlier discussion, since Mr. Oman misstates my view. My view is certainly not that all law professors should have PhDs; my view is that those purporting to do interdisciplinary work should have PhDs or the equivalent formal training in the cognate disciplines.

]]> http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/langdell_and_th.html/comment-page-1#comment-61051 Daniel J. Solove Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:02:27 +0000 http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/langdell-eliot-and-the-rise-of-blogging.html#comment-61051 This is a terrific post. Blogging does indeed touch a fault line in legal academia, and the debates about blogging definitely link up to the debates over legal academia more generally. Readers may be interested in the extensive comments and debate to a post of mine at PrawfsBlawg entitled: <a href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2005/09/do_you_need_a_p.html" rel="nofollow">Do You Need a PhD to Do Competent and Cutting Edge Legal Interdisciplinary Work?</a> This is a terrific post. Blogging does indeed touch a fault line in legal academia, and the debates about blogging definitely link up to the debates over legal academia more generally. Readers may be interested in the extensive comments and debate to a post of mine at PrawfsBlawg entitled: Do You Need a PhD to Do Competent and Cutting Edge Legal Interdisciplinary Work?

]]> http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/langdell_and_th.html/comment-page-1#comment-61050 Kaimi Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:23:55 +0000 http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/langdell-eliot-and-the-rise-of-blogging.html#comment-61050 Nice thoughts, Nate. I agree with much of what you're saying. And besides, who could possibly be better qualified to be a public intellectual than a law professor? At least, that perception is probably widespread -- which goes a way towards explaining the ever-expanding size of the Dan Solove law-prof-blog census. Nice thoughts, Nate. I agree with much of what you’re saying. And besides, who could possibly be better qualified to be a public intellectual than a law professor? At least, that perception is probably widespread — which goes a way towards explaining the ever-expanding size of the Dan Solove law-prof-blog census.

]]>