the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

lr_jkr9_15_08constific.jpg

ad-logo5.jpg

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

Law-Rev-Forum-2.jpg

law-rev-contents2.jpg

Law-Prof-Blog-Census.jpg

Categories

Accounting
Administrative Announcements
Administrative Law
Admiralty
Advertising
Agricultural Law
Anonymity
Antitrust
Architecture
Articles and Books
Bankruptcy
Behavioral Law and Economics
Bioethics
Blogging
Book Reviews
Capital Punishment
Civil Procedure
Civil Rights
Conferences
Constitutional Law
Consumer Protection Law
Contract Law & Beyond
Corporate Finance
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Culture
Current Events
Cyberlaw
DRM
Economic Analysis of Law
Education
Empirical Analysis of Law
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Estates and Trusts
Evidence Law
Family Law
Feminism and Gender
First Amendment
Food
Google & Search Engines
Health Law
History of Law
Humor
Immigration
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International & Comparative Law
Interviews
Jurisprudence
Law and Humanities
Law and Inequality
Law and Psychology
Law Practice
Law Professor Blogger Census
Law Rev (Boston College)
Law Rev (Boston University)
Law Rev (California)
Law Rev (Chicago)
Law Rev (Columbia)
Law Rev (Cornell)
Law Rev (Duke)
Law Rev (Emory)
Law Rev (Fordham)
Law Rev (Georgetown)
Law Rev (GW)
Law Rev (Harvard)
Law Rev (Illinois)
Law Rev (Indiana)
Law Rev (Iowa)
Law Rev (Michigan)
Law Rev (Minnesota)
Law Rev (Northwestern)
Law Rev (Notre Dame)
Law Rev (NYU)
Law Rev (Penn)
Law Rev (S Cal)
Law Rev (Stanford)
Law Rev (Texas)
Law Rev (UCLA)
Law Rev (Vanderbilt)
Law Rev (Virginia)
Law Rev (Wash U)
Law Rev (Wm & Mary)
Law Rev (Yale)
Law Rev Contents
Law Rev Forum
Law School
Law School (Hiring & Laterals)
Law School (Law Reviews)
Law School (Rankings)
Law School (Scholarship)
Law School (Teaching)
Law Student Discussions
Law Talk
Legal Ethics
Legal Theory
Media Law
Movies & Television
Philosophy of Social Science
Politics
Privacy
Privacy (Consumer Privacy)
Privacy (Electronic Surveillance)
Privacy (Gossip & Shaming)
Privacy (ID Theft)
Privacy (Law Enforcement)
Privacy (Medical)
Privacy (National Security)
Property Law
Race
Religion
Reparations
Science Fiction
Second Amendment
Securities
Securities Regulation
Social Network Websites
Sociology of Law
Supreme Court
Tax
Teaching
Technology
Tort Law
Web 2.0
Weird
Wiki
Wills, Trusts, and Estates

Archives

November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

 

« Justice Scalia's CLE | Main | Injustice in Michigan »

January 27, 2006

Is Smoking Child Abuse?

posted by Dan Filler

BBC (among others) reports that California will treat second hand smoke as a form of toxic air pollutant. I assume this will empower a new gang of regulators to join the "war on smoking." I wonder about the effects of these sorts of decisions on smoking parents.

Courts have begun to confront the argument that smoking around children is a form of child abuse. This claim appears to have surfaced repeatedly in child custody battles, but I don't think it has become a common basis for state intervention in families. With findings like those in California, I suspect that more states will seek to intervene when parents smoke at home. State involvement can sometimes take a positive form - counseling, for example - but it can also result in removing children into foster care. When the household problem is smoking, I'm not sure this is a good thing.

Second hand smoke is bad for kids. For children with special health problems, such as asthma, it can be devastating. So there is little question that when parents smoke at home, they are doing harm. This might suggest that smoking ought to be considered abuse per se. But should it?

First, I'm uncertain whether the health effects are serious enough to constitute abuse. Parents do lots of crappy things to, and around, their kids. Does smoking cross the line? Second, I don't totally trust state intervention in families. When the household situation is dire, a state must step in to protect children. Perhaps I'm a cynic, but the repeated evidence of incompetence and neglect by some of these family agencies makes me nervous about their involvement except where truly necessary. Third, I'm not convinced that we want mandatory abuse reporters - doctors, psychologists, social workers and (in some states) lawyers - to report every parent who admits smoking around her child. Mandatory reporting damages relationships with clients, reducing trust and, ultimately, the effectiveness of professional services. This damage is justified only when it prevents truly serious harms.

Then there is the slippery slope problem. Once smoking is viewed as child abuse, prosecutions are likely to follow. And in some jurisdictions, convicted child abusers are subject to Megan's Law notification.

I don't have a problem with parents introducing evidence of smoking in disputes over custodial and visitation arrangements. In these cases, the child will typically end up in the custody of at least one parent. I think smoking around kids is a bad thing. Smoking around a child with respiratory problems seems clearly abusive. But should smoking around a healthy child be the basis for removing her from parental custody? I don't have the answer, but I'm not happy with either result.

Posted by Dan Filler at January 27, 2006 12:17 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/493.

Comments

First, I'm uncertain whether the health effects are serious enough to constitute abuse.

Not that I think this should be the basis for policy-making, but there is also the question of whether a child of a smoker is more likely to become a smoker. I think the statistics point to a probabilistic "yes."

Posted by: KipEsquire at January 27, 2006 07:39 AM


I agree with Kip wholeheartedly. Seeing a parent smoke through their whole life is sure to make a child view smoking as a regular thing to do, and therefore more likely to do it. Plenty of harm is done by second hand smoke in my eyes; even making the child cough more often than other children is abuse to me.

Posted by: Garrett at January 27, 2006 09:05 AM


I have moderate asthma because my mom smoked in the house, often in the same room as me, during my whole childhood (and likely while she was pregnant with me). I've often wished over my lifetime there was a law against it.

Posted by: Amy at January 27, 2006 09:22 AM


If smoking is child abuse because it exposes the child the unhealthy conditions, then any parent with a home that is not perfectly up to sanitation standards (and is thereby exposing the child to disease or other harm) is guilty of child abuse.

Posted by: Dennis J. Tuchler at January 27, 2006 11:29 AM


Did you just post something arguing that schools should not randomly drug test students because of the bad things the policy teaches students? Seems like parents smoking in front of their kids - putting aside the obvious health risks - also teaches children bad habits.

Posted by: Mike at January 27, 2006 01:23 PM


Check out http://fullmetalattorney.blogspot.com/2006/01/second-hand-smoke.html for another impartial view on the second-hand smoke and smoking ban issue.

Posted by: Kelly at January 27, 2006 02:03 PM


Children in pro smoking homes suffer more colds, flus, respiratory tract infections, miss alot more days of school, necessary learning and education, are exposed to the addictive drugs of nicotine and tar and anything else tobacco plants put in there cigarettes without the filter and are alot more susceptible to picking up the addiction,habit whatever you call it thus killing themselves. Death by cigarette, not child abuse, give me a break, thankyou

Posted by: Roger C. McMillion at February 9, 2006 10:45 AM


Yes it is.

Posted by: Roger at February 9, 2006 10:45 AM


I agree that smoking when children are present in the same room is very wrong. However the goverment and ASI should spend more time caring for the children who are victims of REAL abuse such as sexual, physical & menal abuse. I grew up in a household with three smoking adults and five siblings and not one of the children smoke. Although my parents smoked in front of us we still had love, hugs, kisses, a great baseball coach and PTA Mother. We all attended top Prep schools and were exposed to all the wonderful culture NYC had to offer. We traveled the world starting at very young ages and had the best of everything. We all became very educated and acheived our goals. So did my parents abused their children???? No way. I only pray that kids get the same love and support that we did. Gov't... stick to finding and incarcerating the real criminals!

Posted by: nycarch at November 12, 2006 09:47 PM


The fact that parents smoke in front of their children in the absence of any other form of abuse speaks volumes in itself. It just shows how self-absorbed some people can be even with the knowledge that they may be doing permanent harm to their children. How hard is it to step outside to have a cigarette? The real crime here is a genuine disrespect for children who cannot make and/or enforce decisions for themselves. Smoking in the presence of a child (or any other person for that matter) dishonors their rights as a person especially in this day and age where information about the effects of smoking permeate our everyday lives.

My only wish for the parent who supposes they are giving everything to their children is that they be exposed to that same smoke the day that they become ill and can't handle the smoke anymore.

Posted by: suepercede at January 3, 2007 01:00 AM


I come home everyday from school wishing that my parents didn't smoke. Not only that, but if I walk into a room and open the window I get yelled at and they claim "I'm letting the cold air in" maybe if there wasn't a cloud of smoke in the living room I wouldn't do that. And also every morning while I am getting ready, my dad wakes up, sits in the living room and smokes a cigarette, while I'm traveling through the house getting ready and having to smell like smoke all day. It's horrible and there should deffidently be a law against it.

Posted by: Kayla at February 13, 2007 06:40 PM


My 5 year old son has just started his array of testing to get to the root of his chronic coughing problem. His father, whom he visits every other weekend smokes in his house and his vehicle with our son. In my opinion, his smoking is definately child abuse in this situation. What are we going to do? Wait until these children grow up and all have some form of cancer before we step-up and say "Hmm...maybe we should have given that issue another thought!" Come on people, wake up and read the facts. Our children are being victimized and can't speak for themselves. Just because we can't physically see the damage doesn't mean it's not abuse!

Posted by: singlemom at February 18, 2007 11:29 PM


smoking around children is avery sirious abuse,reason being ,if a perrent smoke near a child,that particular child will take in close proximity to what his/her parent is doing practice doing that,i think the parrent in that way disrespect the rights the rights of the children

Posted by: kotjane kj at August 12, 2007 06:08 AM


smoking around children is avery sirious abuse,reason being ,if a perrent smoke near a child,that particular child will take in close proximity to what his/her parent is doing practice doing that,i think the parrent in that way disrespect the rights the rights of the children

Posted by: kotjane kj at August 12, 2007 06:08 AM


smoking arrond children and in public should be banned ,due to the problem that is caused by smoking habbit

Posted by: kotjane kj(qwa qwa) at August 12, 2007 06:14 AM


JUST LAST WEEK I WITNESSED A FAMILY WITH AN INFANT IN THE CAR SEAT. THE FATHER DRIVING WAS SMOKING AND THE GRANDMOTHER SITTING BESIDE THE INFANT WAS SMOKING. THIS WAS VERY DISTURBING TO ME. HOW CAN THESE PEOPLE BE SO STUPID!!! SURELY THIS SHOULD BE SEEN AS CHILD ABUSE. LAWS SHOULD BE PASSED TO PROTECT THESE CHILDREN!!!

Posted by: ZACK at November 10, 2007 09:57 AM


As a nurse working in Hospice/Long-Term care I've seen first hand how 2nd hand smoke kills people. A lung cancer/COPD death is agonizing, imagine very slowly drowning on dry land because SOMEONE ELSE smoked and was too lazy to step outside. Any parent who exposes their child to toxic/life threatening subtances knowingly should be beaten in public.

Posted by: Sabrina at July 28, 2008 11:37 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Michael O'Shea

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Robert Ahdieh
Miriam Cherry
Mark Edwards
Susan Kuo
Jonathan Lipson
Scott Moss
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Geoffrey Rapp
Susan Scafidi
Howard Wasserman






ad-logo3.jpg

blawg100_winner2.jpg

Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Craig Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Dan Kahan
Sam Kamin
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Joseph Liu
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo PeƱalver
Neil RIchards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Paul Secunda
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Robert Tsai
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
Beltway Blogroll
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
Convictions
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
JD2B.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian
Mirror of Justice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
Political Theory Daily Review
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member