<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being Eugene Volokh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/being_eugene_vo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/being_eugene_vo.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 3L</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/being_eugene_vo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60646</link>
		<dc:creator>3L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/being-eugene-volokh.html#comment-60646</guid>
		<description>I noticed this same thing once when looking up blog citations in court cases on Lexis. There was one case which cited an old Volokh post, but it had become the SEO Reviewer. I expect this will be a perpetual problem as blogs are cited more frequently in court cases.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed this same thing once when looking up blog citations in court cases on Lexis. There was one case which cited an old Volokh post, but it had become the SEO Reviewer. I expect this will be a perpetual problem as blogs are cited more frequently in court cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/being_eugene_vo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60645</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/being-eugene-volokh.html#comment-60645</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a pretty unflattering picture, with an unflattering position. can you post a different one?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a pretty unflattering picture, with an unflattering position. can you post a different one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaimi</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/being_eugene_vo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60644</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/being-eugene-volokh.html#comment-60644</guid>
		<description>Nate,

This happens all the time.  It happened to Jordan Fowles&#039; old site:  http://fowles.blogspot.com/ .

If you ever decide to close down A Good Oman for good, hang on to the blogspot name.  I would hate to see it being used to hawk phone cards or search engine farms.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate,</p>
<p>This happens all the time.  It happened to Jordan Fowles&#8217; old site:  <a href="http://fowles.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://fowles.blogspot.com/</a> .</p>
<p>If you ever decide to close down A Good Oman for good, hang on to the blogspot name.  I would hate to see it being used to hawk phone cards or search engine farms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balasubramani</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/being_eugene_vo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60643</link>
		<dc:creator>Balasubramani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/being-eugene-volokh.html#comment-60643</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how solid those claims are but I am pretty sure the ACPA extends to unregistered marks and personal names protectible as marks.  Where the alleged infringer engages in no commercial activity (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techlawjournal.com/topstories/2005/20050824c.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;or engages in criticism&lt;/a&gt;) the claims are a bit tougher, but here, where driving traffic is the sole goal, courts may be more receptive.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how solid those claims are but I am pretty sure the ACPA extends to unregistered marks and personal names protectible as marks.  Where the alleged infringer engages in no commercial activity (<a href="http://www.techlawjournal.com/topstories/2005/20050824c.asp" rel="nofollow">or engages in criticism</a>) the claims are a bit tougher, but here, where driving traffic is the sole goal, courts may be more receptive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balasubramani</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/being_eugene_vo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60642</link>
		<dc:creator>Balasubramani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2006/01/being-eugene-volokh.html#comment-60642</guid>
		<description>Maybe there&#039;s a decent cybersquatting or a personality rights claim.  It&#039;s amazing how many blawgs spawn knockoff domain names.  I know Althouse and How Appealing for sure.  I tried accessing those blogs while traveling once and ended up at sites that had nothing to do with those blogs.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe there&#8217;s a decent cybersquatting or a personality rights claim.  It&#8217;s amazing how many blawgs spawn knockoff domain names.  I know Althouse and How Appealing for sure.  I tried accessing those blogs while traveling once and ended up at sites that had nothing to do with those blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
