Comments on: SupremeCourtOf TheUnitedStates.blogspot.com?

By: mmufqv

mmufqv — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:30:32 +0000

http://20six.co.uk/ritas/

By: Lusidvicel

Lusidvicel — Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:07:15 +0000

Hello, i love http://www.concurringopinions.com! Let me in, please

By: K

Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:26:05 +0000

What do you think amicus briefs are for?

By: Ohio 2nd

Ohio 2nd — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:38:16 +0000

Bush v Gore

By: Beltway Blogroll

Beltway Blogroll — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:52:32 +0000

An Appeal For A Supreme Blog

Blogger Jason Mazzone at Concurring Opinions thinks a blog at the Supreme Court just might improve the quality of court opinions. His proposal: “The Supreme Court should operate a blog to generate input on the court’s opinions before they are…

By: SCOTUSblog

SCOTUSblog — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:33:29 +0000

Blog Round-Up – Sunday, December 18th

Here Concurring Opinions has a post proposing a new SCOTUSBlog – one operated by the court itself to generate input on the Court’s opinions before they are published. Here is Tony Mauro with an article about the Court’s annual “Christmas”…

By: Daniel J. Solove

Daniel J. Solove — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:40:49 +0000

What kinds of issues do you have in mind where you believe the blog will be of assistance? Ones involving precedent and caselaw? Or ones involving factual and empirical matters? Or both? Can you provide an example of a specific case or issue where tapping into the wisdom of the blogosphere would have potentially assisted the Court?