<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/11/wex.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/11/wex.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/11/wex.html/comment-page-1#comment-62042</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2005/11/wex.html#comment-62042</guid>
		<description>Should this be seen as having the diametric opposite problem to Wikipedia? Wikipedia&#039;s great strength is that &lt;i&gt;anyone&lt;/i&gt; can edit it; it&#039;s main problem is, of course, that &lt;i&gt;anyone&lt;/i&gt; can edit it. LII seem to be going to the opposite extreme: they will get total editorial discretion, but only at the price of narrowing the growth.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should this be seen as having the diametric opposite problem to Wikipedia? Wikipedia&#8217;s great strength is that <i>anyone</i> can edit it; it&#8217;s main problem is, of course, that <i>anyone</i> can edit it. LII seem to be going to the opposite extreme: they will get total editorial discretion, but only at the price of narrowing the growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

