<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Volokh Is Wrong on Public Records and the First Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/10/why_volokh_is_w.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/10/why_volokh_is_w.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concurring Opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/10/why_volokh_is_w.html/comment-page-1#comment-62957</link>
		<dc:creator>Concurring Opinions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2005/10/why-volokh-is-wrong-on-public-records-and-the-first-amendment.html#comment-62957</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Should Divorce Records Be Public or Private?&lt;/strong&gt;

A USA Today story raises the issue about whether divorce records should be public or private. The article has a good discussion of the law of divorce record confidentiality, and it has examples of several cases where reporters obtained divorce...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Should Divorce Records Be Public or Private?</strong></p>
<p>A USA Today story raises the issue about whether divorce records should be public or private. The article has a good discussion of the law of divorce record confidentiality, and it has examples of several cases where reporters obtained divorce&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searchlight Crusade</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/10/why_volokh_is_w.html/comment-page-1#comment-62956</link>
		<dc:creator>Searchlight Crusade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2005/10/why-volokh-is-wrong-on-public-records-and-the-first-amendment.html#comment-62956</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Holy Orwellian Bureaucrats Batman!&lt;/strong&gt;

Holy Orwellian Bureaucracy Batman!&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

Volokh Conspiracy talks about California&#039;s &quot;Megan&#039;s Law Website&quot; and First Amendment Violations there...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Holy Orwellian Bureaucrats Batman!</strong></p>
<p>Holy Orwellian Bureaucracy Batman!</p>
<p>Volokh Conspiracy talks about California&#8217;s &#8220;Megan&#8217;s Law Website&#8221; and First Amendment Violations there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searchlight Crusade</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2005/10/why_volokh_is_w.html/comment-page-1#comment-62955</link>
		<dc:creator>Searchlight Crusade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2005/10/why-volokh-is-wrong-on-public-records-and-the-first-amendment.html#comment-62955</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Holy Orwellian Bureaucrats Batman!&lt;/strong&gt;

Holy Orwellian Bureaucracy Batman!&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

Volokh Conspiracy talks about California&#039;s &quot;Megan&#039;s Law Website&quot; and First Amendment Violations there...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Holy Orwellian Bureaucrats Batman!</strong></p>
<p>Holy Orwellian Bureaucracy Batman!</p>
<p>Volokh Conspiracy talks about California&#8217;s &#8220;Megan&#8217;s Law Website&#8221; and First Amendment Violations there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

