Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Andrew MacKie-Mason on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • G. Calamita on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Gerard Magliocca on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Mike on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Ben on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Samir Chopra on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Chris Berry on Who Gets to Keep Trover?

    • Prof. W. Matias on Introducing Guest Blogger andré douglas pond cummings
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Spinning Straw into Gold

posted by Nate Oman

LawBooks.jpgI was initially attracted to the law because I thought that the books looked cool. My father is an art historian and my mother was an adjunct English professor before she became a tech writer. My grandfathers were a rancher and a farmer respectively. I did not come from a legal background. Nevertheless, my first year of college I wrote a paper that required that I venture into the law library, and I was entranced by the look and feel of old copies of the U.S. Reports.

There was something about the heavy mustiness of the books, the calfskin bindings, and the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century type faces that captured my imagination. The books just looked like they contained “lore” and “learning.” One of the great pleasures of my clerkship was going through my judge’s personal collection of rare legal books: a first edition of Blackstone, Yearbooks printed in the 17th and 16th centuries, a Restoration-era printing of the record in Charles I’s trial, and so on.


My wife finds my fascination on this point incomprehensible. She has poked about in some of my law books and finds the disputes about assumpsits, pendant jurisdiction, or legal hermeneutics that I love unspeakably dry. As she rightly points out, her books have pictures of dismembered cadavers and diagrams of the swallowing mechanism. Much more interesting.

Nevertheless, to me there is a kind of beauty in seeing how the law weaves the pedestrian disputes of life into a fabric ultimately concerned with power, justice, and the good society. Jurisprudence spins the straw of the everyday into the gold of applied philosophy and political economy. No mean feat, that.

It seems to me that spinning straw into gold is a great deal of what lawyers – practical and academic – do. You take a pile of undistinguished facts and turn it into a story about wrong and injustice, the distribution of political power, the advance of prosperity, or so on. Professors – if they are good – can take the mundane details of their subjects and spin connections to basic themes about human action and the good society. Apart from its intrinsic value, one of the things that makes the law fascinating for me is the sheer intellectual challenge of taking the boring or the pedestrian and making it interesting.


 October 20, 2005 at 3:57 pm   Posted in: Legal Theory   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (11)

  1. Kaimi - October 20, 2005 at 4:19 pm

    Well, we lawyers certainly take straw and turn it into . . . something.

    Whether your own straw-to-gold metaphor is the most appropriate metaphor, or whether a more apt description might discuss the start-to-finish transformation that horses and cattle commonly effect on straw — well, it’s possible that reasonable minds might differ on the outcome of that particular question.

  2. Hedgehog - October 20, 2005 at 5:14 pm

    My grandmother was the County Law Librarian (and the Draft Board) in the 50′s and 60′s. She’d occasionally take me to work with her and pay me (a quarter or two) to update the pocket parts in all those glorious volumes. As an L1 as the rest of my class struggled with the vagaried Am Jur and Fed 2nd and Pac Rep I was at home – they were old friends from my childhood. And while I still had to learn all the “magic words”, that familiarity stood me in good stead.

  3. Daniel Solove - October 20, 2005 at 5:25 pm

    Ah, the beauty of old books . . . definitely, there’s something wonderful and irreplaceable about the physical book. Part of me loves the fact that now we can access all the cases electronically, but part of me laments the fact that law books may soon be entirely replaced by electrons. The computer doesn’t capture the magic of a set of the U.S. Reports or F.3d. I wonder how many growing up today will speak fondly of the mustiness of Westlaw or the leather of Lexis. Alas.

  4. Simon - October 20, 2005 at 7:47 pm

    It’s true that being able to search word-by-word online is very helpful, but I agree with the previous posters, that there is something irreplacable about holding this material in your hands, or looking at a wall of books (Daniel’s polite euphemism about a “set” of U.S. reports – which, these days, arrives in the mail in its own handy presentation wall o’ shelves) and realizing what you’re looking at. As Giles says, in defense of books over computers, in Buffy the Vampire Slayer: “knowledge should be smelly!”

  5. Nate Oman - October 21, 2005 at 12:49 pm

    “As Giles says, in defense of books over computers, in Buffy the Vampire Slayer: “knowledge should be smelly!”"

    Indeed. One of the wisest lines in a show filled with wise lines.

  6. madisonian.net - October 21, 2005 at 10:41 pm

    The Smell of Law in the Morning

    At Concurring Opinions, Nate Oman posts about the romance of old law books. (I’ll ride my argument about the significance of “things” as long and as far as I can.) Every Fall, early in the semester, I bring in a volume from the Wes…

  7. Greyhame: Law and Law School - October 23, 2005 at 3:58 pm

    Old Law Books

    At Concurring Opinions, there is a nice little tribute to old law books. Personally, I think the entire West and Lexis systems should probably be abolished in favor of a free research system operated by the federal government. (Heresy,…

  8. Concurring Opinions - November 29, 2005 at 2:07 pm

    History of the Book

    Folks here at concurringopinions have been talking a lot about books recently–Nate Oman’s had posts on the appeal of law books (particularly old ones) and law reviews and Dan Solove’s posted about the open library. I find student-edited law…

  9. Concurring Opinions - November 29, 2005 at 2:07 pm

    History of the Book

    Folks here at concurringopinions have been talking a lot about books recently–Nate Oman’s had posts on the appeal of law books (particularly old ones) and law reviews and Dan Solove’s posted about the open library. I find student-edited law…

  10. anwar - December 15, 2007 at 12:49 am

    I am poor person, I need some law books for knowledge about humain rights.

  11. Lou Lower - September 18, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    All very touching and poetic, but I am faced with the tangible problem of finding a place or market for hundreds, possibly thousands of law books from the sequential law practices of my father and brother. In the digital age, there seems to be no market or place for those beautiful, evocative law books. Anyone have experience or suggestions to address my problem? Indiana location.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress